Enfoques republicanos contemporáneos sobre la democracia y su potencial cosmopolita
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2005.i33.423Keywords:
republicanism, liberalism, democracy, globalization, cosmopolitismoAbstract
Has republican political theory any resources to offer contemporary democracy? Two objections are addressed: that contemporary republican theory is too internally contested to offer a coherent approach, and that any valuable insights are indistinguishable from liberal theory. I argued that, despite certain common ground between republicans and liberals, their engagement with democracy displays different approaches, tensions and accommodations. Republicanism has a coherent underlying perspective and offersa distinctive approach to grounding and conceiving democracy. Its emphasis on deliberation among citizens in multiple public spheres, rather than on unitary popular sovereignity can potentially contribute to addressing problems of understanding and realising democracy at transnational and global levels.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2005-12-30
How to Cite
Honohan, I. (2005). Enfoques republicanos contemporáneos sobre la democracia y su potencial cosmopolita. Isegoría, (33), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2005.i33.423
Issue
Section
Notes and Discussions
License
Copyright (c) 2005 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.