Glowing Plants and Living Machines. Towards a Critique of Synthetic Biology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2016.055.04Keywords:
Theory of Technoscience, Design Turn, Biopolitics, “Life” as Code, Promises of Digital Biology, Engineerin, MediatheoryAbstract
This article criticly engages with 1) synthetic biologys’ technoscientific specifica, 2) the role of biotechnical and biopolitical promises of perfectibility of‚ life itself’, and 3) the problematic notion of ‘digital biology’. Synthetic biology dismisses the idea of an already given nature: ‘life itself’ is conceptualized as a field of potentialities, with adaptable materials and flexible structures that can be used for re-engineering to ‘perfect’ nature. Bioengineers claim to create new living organisms from scratch, using genetically standardized parts and computer-based design: ‘Living machines’ which do not exist in nature are supposed to serve human purposes. Beyond its actual (and limited) state of research, some voices of synthetic biology offer bold claims of socio-technical scenarios, imagined objects, and future biotechnical experiments, which take place in society rather than behind laboratory doors. With their visions, synthetic biologists are becoming engineers of future societies. Synthetic biology develops a ‘biotechnologization of collective futures’ and it is part of a technoscientific ‘promise- economy’ that aims on colonizing the future - which demands to rethink Foucaults the question of biopolitics. Crucial for synthetic biologys’ promise of ‘digital biology’ are script-centered, bio-cybernetic, and even transhumanist figures of thought that fuel new visions of ‘life and nature’ as a field of potentials and even limitless treasures that can be programmed and produced by computational procedures: ‘writing’ the code of life.
Downloads
References
Adam. B., Groves, C. (2007), Future matters. Brill, London. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004161771.i-218
Bensaude Vincent, B. (2011), Materials as machines. In: Carrier M., Nordmann A. (ed) Science in the context of application. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9051-5_7 PMid:21387186
Bensaude Vincent, B. (2013), Between the possible and the actual: philosophical perspectives on the design of synthetic organisms. Futures 48: 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2013.02.006
Bensaude Vincent B., Loeve, S., Nordmann, A. and Schwarz, A. (2011), Matters of interest: the objects of research in science and technoscience. Journal for general philosophy of science 42: 365-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-011-9172-y
Bethge P., Grolle, J. (2013), Interview with George Church: can neanderthals be brought back from the dead? Spiegel-Online. http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/george- church-explains-how-dna-will-be-construction-material-of-the-future-a- 877634.html. Accessed 14 Jun 2015.
Bublitz H., Bührmann, A.D., Hanke, C., Seier, A. (eds) (1999), Das Wuchern der Diskurse. Perspektiven der Diskursanalyse Foucaults. Campus, Frankfurt/Main.
Carlson, R. (2012), Biology is technology. The Promise, peril, and new business of engineering life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge/Massachusetts.
Catts O., Zurr, I. (2014), Countering the engineering mindset: the conflict of art and synthetic biology. In: Ginsberg, A. D., Calvert, J., Schyfter, P., Elfick, A., Endy, D. (ed) Synthetic aesthetics: investigating synthetic biology's designs on nature. MIT Press, Cambridge/Massachusetts.
Clark, L. (2013), Glowing trees could pave the way for solving world problems with biology. Wired UK. http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-05/9/glowing-plantskickstarter. Accessed 14 Jun 2015.
Church, G.M., Regis, E. (2012), Regenesis. How synthetic biology will reinvent nature and ourselves. Basic Books, New York.
Collins, J. (2012), Synthetic biology: bits and pieces come to life. In: Nature, 7387, 8-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/483S8a PMid:22378128
Corbyn, Z. (2013), Craig Venter: 'this isn't a fantasy look at the future. We are doing the future ' In: The Guardian , Oct. 12, p 41.
Fox Keller, E. (2002), Making sense of life. Explaining biological development with models, metaphors, and machines. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Foucault, M. (1997), Society must be defended: lectures at the collège de france, 1975-1976. St. Martin's Press, New York. PMCid:PMC1181168
Fu, P., Panke, S. (eds.) (2009), Systems biology and synthetic biology. Wiley, Hoboken.
Ginsberg, A.D., Calvert, J., Schyfter, P., Elfick, A., Endy, D. (eds.) (2014), Synthetic aesthetics: investigating synthetic biology's designs on nature. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Haraway, D.J. (1997),Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse™. Feminism and technoscience. Routledge, New York.
Highfield, R. (2013), J. Craig Venter sequenced the human genome. Now he wants to convert DNA into a digital signal. Interview, Wired UK. http://www.wired.co.uk/magazine/ archive/2013/11/features/j-craig-venter-interview. Accessed 14 June 2015.
Joly, P-B. (2010), On the economics of techno-scientific promises. In: Akrich, M., Barthe, Y., Muniesa, F., Mustar, P. (eds). Débordements. Mélanges offerts à Michel Callon, Paris, Presse des Mines. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pressesmines.747
Jones R. (2006), Economy of promises, Nature Nanotechnology 3, 65–66. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.14 PMid:18654457
Kastenhofer, K., Schwarz, A. (2011), Editorial: Probing Technoscience. Poiesis & Praxis 8 (2- 3), 61-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-011-0103-0 PMid:22207826 PMCid:PMC3234348
Kay, L.E. (2000), Who wrote the book of life? A history of the genetic code. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Knight, T. F. (2005), Engineering novel life. Molecular Systems Biology 1: E1. Knorr Cetina K. (2005), The rise of a culture of life. EMBO reports 6, 76–80.
Kwok, R. (2010), Five hard truths for synthetic biology. Nature 463, 288-290. https://doi.org/10.1038/463288a PMid:20090726
Latour, B. (2008), What is the style of matters of concern? Two lectures in empirical philosophy. Van Gorcum: Assen.
Latour, B. (2009), A cautious prometheus? A few steps toward a philosophy of design In: Hackne, F., Glynne, J., Minto, V. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2008 annual international conference of the design history society. – Falmouth, 3-6 September 2009, e-books, Universal Publishers, p 2–10.
Lucht, P., Erlemann, M., Ruiz, B. (eds.) (2010), Technologisierung gesellschaftlicher Zukünfte. Nanotechnlogien in wissenschaftlicher, politischer und öffentlicher Praxis. Centaurus, Freiburg.
Nordmann, A. (2006), Collapse of distance: epistemic strategies of science and technoscience. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy, 41, 7-34.
Nordman, A., Radder, H., Schiemann, G. (eds) (2011), Science transformed: debating claims of an epochal break. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.
Reardon, S. (2011), Visions of synthetic biology. In: Scince 333, 1242-1243. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.333.6047.1242
Rose, H., Rose, S.P.R. (2012), Genes, cells, and brains. The promethean promises of the new biology. Verso, London.
Schäffner, W. (2010), The Design Turn. Eine wissenschaftliche Revolution im Geiste der Gestaltung. In: Claudia Mareis (eds.) Entwerfen - Wissen - Produzieren. Designforschung im Anwendungskontext. Transcript, Bielefeld. https://doi.org/10.14361/transcript.9783839414637.33
Schmidt, M., Kelle, A., Ganguli-Mitra, A., de Vriend, H. (eds.) (2009), Synthetic biology. The technoscience and its societal consequences. Springer, Dordrecht.
Thacker, E. (2004), Biomedia. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Thacker, E. (2006), The global genome. Biotechnology, politics, and culture. MIT Press, Cambridge/Massachusetts.
Thacker, E. (2009), «De anima»: on life and the living. In: Bock von Wülfingen, Bettina and Ute Frietsch (eds.) Epistemologie und Differenz. Zur Reproduktion des Wissens in den Wissenschaften. Transcript, Bielefeld.
Venter, J.C. (2010), Synthetic life. Transcript Press conference https://www.ted.com/talks/ craig_venter_unveils_synthetic_life/transcript. Accessed 14 Jun 2015.
Venter, J.C. (2013), Life at the speed of light. From the double helix to the dawn of digital life. Viking, New York.
Weber, J. (2003), Umkämpfte Bedeutungen. Naturkonzepte im Zeitalter der Technoscience. Campus, Frankfurt/Main.
Weber, J. (2010), Making worlds: epistemological, ontological and political dimensions of technoscience. Poiesis & Praxis 7 (1-2):17-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-010-0076-4
Weber, J. (2011), Technoscience as popular culture. On pleasure, consumer technologies & the economy of attention. In: Nordman, A., Radder, H., Schiemann, G. (eds.) (2011) Science transformed: debating claims of an epochal break. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.
Wohlsen, M. (2011), Biopunk: DIY Scientists Hack the Software of Life. Pinguin, New York. PMid:21585405
Zakeriemail, B., Carremail, P. A. (2015), The limits of synthetic biology. Trend in Biotechnology, 33/2, 57-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.10.008 PMid:25466877
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
