La crisis de la noción de legalidad y la defensa de la ley por Sócrates

Laura Sancho Rocher

doi:10.3989/isegoria.2023.69.21

Autores/as

Laura Sancho Rocher Universidad de Zaragoza https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0926-0442

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2023.69.21

Palabras clave:

Ley, ley no-escrita, persuasión, obediencia, democracia

Resumen

Se plantea en este ensayo la discutida posición de Sócrates acerca de las leyes de Atenas: tanto la ley democrática y positiva, como la ley tradicional no-escrita. Se argumenta sobre las fuentes que tenemos, especialmente la Apología y el Critón de Platón, y los Memorabilia de Jenofonte. Se concluye que Sócrates no dejó nunca, a lo largo de su dilatada existencia, de intentar persuadir sobre la justicia, sosteniendo que, bajo ningún concepto, era justo hacer daño, ni incumplir las leyes o las órdenes de la autoridad superior (humana o divina).

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Banfi, A. (2012). "Qualche considerazione interna al controllo di legittimità a Atene", en E. Cantarella, M. Gagarin, J. M. Modrzejewski, G. Thür, eds., Symposion 2011, Wien, 49-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1vw0q8s.9

Bertelli, L. (1989). "Metabolé politeion", Filosofia politica 3.2, 275-326.

Brickhouse, Th. C., Smith, N. D. (1994). Plato's Socrates, New York-Oxford, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195081756.001.0001

Brulé, P. (2023). Socrate l'Athénien, Paris, Les Belles Lettres.

Camassa, G. (2003). "I greci davanti al problema del mutamento", Quaderni di Storia 57, 147-172.

Canevaro, M. (2015). "Making and Changing Laws in Ancient Athens", en M. Canevaro, E. Harris, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Greek Law, Aug. 2015, on-line, 46 pp. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199599257.013.4

Carawan, E. (2007). "The Trial of Arginusae Generals and the Dawn of 'Judicial Review'", Dike 10, 19-56.

Cerri, G. (2010). "Il significato dell'espressione 'leggi non scritte' nell'Atene del V secolo a.C.: formula polivalente o rinvio ad un corpus giuridico di tradizione orale?", Mediterraneo Antico 13.1-2, 139-146.

Colson, D. (1985). "On Appealing to Athenian Law to Justify Socrates' Disobedience", Apeiron 19.2, 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1515/APEIRON.1985.19.2.133

Connor, W. R. (1991). "The Other 399: Religion and the Trial of Socrates", en M. A. Flower, M. Tolos, eds., Georgica: Greek Studies in Honour of G. Cawkwell, London, University of London, 49-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-5370.1991.tb02204.x

Danzig, G. (2014). "Alcibiades versus Pericles: Apologetic Strategies in Xenophon's Memorabilia", Greece & Rome 61.1, 7-28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383513000211

Dorion, L.-A. (2003). Xénophon, Mémorables. Introduction Générale, Paris, Les Belles Lettres.

Dorion, L.-A. (2010). "The Straussian Exegesis of Xenophon: The Paradigmatic Case of Memorabilia IV.4", en V. Gray, ed., Xenophon (Oxford Readings in Classical Studies), Oxford University Press, 283-323.

Dorion, L.-A. (2018). "Plato and Xenophon on the Different Reasons that Socrates Always Obeys the Law", en D. Danzig, D. Johnson, D. Morrison, eds., Plato and Xenophon. Comparative Studies, Leiden-Boston, Brill, 487-509. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004369085_020

Giannantoni, G. (1972). ¿Qué ha dicho verdaderamente Sócrates?, Madrid, Doncel, [Florencia 1971].

Gray, V. J. (1998). The Framing of Socrates. The Literary Interpretation of Xenophon's Memorabilia, Stuttgart, Franz Steiner Verlag.

Gray, V. J. (2004). "Le Socrate de Xénophon et la démocratie", Les études philosophiques 69 (L. Brisson y L.-A. Dorion, eds., Les écrits socratiques de Xénophon), 141-176. https://doi.org/10.3917/leph.042.0141

Hansen, M. H. (1995). The Trial of Sokrates from Athenian Point of View, Copenhagen, Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selska.

Harris, E. M. (2006). "Antigone the Lawyer, or the Ambiguities of Nomos", Democracy and the Rule of Law in Classical Athens. Essays on Law, Society and Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 41-80. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497858.005

Hirzel, R. (1887). "Polykrates' Anklage und Lysias' Verteidigung des Sokrates", Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 42, 239-250.

Humbert, J. (1931). "Le pamphlet de Polykratès et le Gorgias de Platon", Revue de Philologie 57, 20-77.

Irwin, T. H. (1989). "Socrates and Athenian Democracy (Review: The Trial of Socrates by I. F. Stone)", Philosophy and Public Affairs 18.2, 184-205.

Johnson, D. M. (2003). "Xenophon's Socrates on Law and Justice", Ancient Philosophy 23, 255-281. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil200323234

Kraut, R. (1984). Socrates and the State, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Kroeker, R. (2009). "Xenophon as a Critic of the Athenian Democracy", History of Political Thought 30.2, 197-228.

Menzel, A. (1979). "Untersuchungen zum Sokrates Process", Hellenica. Gesammelte kleine Schriften, Aalen [Baden bei Wien 1938], Scientia Verlag, 5-65.

Montuori, M. (1981). Socrates. Phisiology of a Myth, Amsterdam, Brill, [Firenze, 1974].

Morrison, D. (1995). "Xenophon's Socrates on the Just and the Lawful", Ancient Philosophy 15, 329-347. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil19951521

Morrison, D. (2001). "Some Central Elements of Socratic Theory", Polis. The Journal of the Society of Greek Political Thought 18.1-2, 27-40. https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-90000030

Nails, D. (2009). "The Trial and Death of Socrates", en R. K. Balot, A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought, Pondicherry, Wiley-Blackwell, 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444310344.ch21

Nightingale, A. W. (1999). "Plato's Lawcode in Context. Rule by Written Law in Athens and Magnesia", Classical Quarterly 49.1, 100-122. https://doi.org/10.1093/cq/49.1.100

Ober, J. (2000). "Living Freely as a Slave of the Law. Note on Why Sokrates Lives in Athens", en P. Flensted-Jensen; T. Heine Nielsen; L. Rubinstein, eds., Polis and Politics: Studies in Ancient Greek History Presented to Mogens Herman Hansen on his Sixtieth Birthday, Copenhagen, Museum Tusculanum Press, 541-552.

Poddighe, E. (2019). "Agraphoi nomoi e politeia nel discorso funebre di Pericles", Dike 22, 3-80.

Rosen, F, (1998). "A Creature of Moderns Scholarship: Disobedience and the Crito Problem", Polis. The Journal of the Society of Greek Political Thought 15. 1-2, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-90000001

Rowe, C. J. (2001). "Killing Socrates: Plato's Later Thoughts on Democracy", Journal of Hellenic Studies 121, 63-76. https://doi.org/10.2307/631828

Salduti, V. (2015). "Il ritorno alle leggi sovrane", en F. Lucrezi, M. Marazzi, V. Salduti, C. Simonetti, eds., Leggi e limite, Napoli , Editoriale Scientifica, 95-135.

Sebell, D. (2021). Xenophon's Socratic Education. Reason, Religion, and the Limits of Politics. Philadelphia, U. of Philadelphia Press (iBook). https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812297843

Solana Dueso, J. (2013). Más allá de la ciudad. El pensamiento político de Sócrates, Zaragoza, Institución Fernando el Católico (CSIC).

Strauss, L. (1965). Natural Right and History, Chicago-London, The University of Chicago Press [1953].

Strauss, L. (1972). Xenophon's Socrates, Ithaca & London, Cornell University Press.

Vlastos, G. (1983a). "The Historical Socrates and Athenian Democracy", Political Theory 11.4, 495-516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591783011004002

Vlastos, G. (1983b). "The Socratic Elenchus", Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1, 27-58.

Walther, M. (2002). "Wider den Legalismus in der Ethik. Der Gegensatz von Natur (physis) und Norm (nomos) und die Ansätze zu einer Utilitarismus (Tugend-) Ethik bei Antiphon", S. Kirste, K. Waechter, M. Walther, eds., Die Sophistik. Entstehung, Gestalt und Folgeprobleme des Gegensatzes von Naturrecht und positiven Recht, Stuttgart, Franz Steiner Verlag, 41-58.

Woozley, A. D. (1979). Law and Obedience. The Arguments of Plato's Crito, London, Duckworth.