El proyecto de naturalización de la ética como un caso de investigación interdisciplinar en la filosofía moral
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2025.73.1634Palabras clave:
filosofía moral, ciencia cognitiva, psicología moral, investigación interdisciplinar, naturalización de la éticaResumen
En este artículo, mi objetivo es proporcionar un ejemplo de una práctica concreta que ilustra el trabajo interdisciplinar en el ámbito de la filosofía moral. Más concretamente, presentaré el llamado proyecto de naturalización de la ética, que ha sido llevado a cabo en las últimas décadas tanto por filósofos morales como por científicos de diversas áreas, como uno de esos ejemplos de interdisciplinaridad que puede considerarse fructífero. En este artículo, buscaré describir dicho proyecto a partir de las contribuciones que provienen de la psicología moral y cognitiva, y trataré de mostrar sus potencialidades en cuanto al avance del conocimiento, así como algunos de sus límites.
Descargas
Citas
Bargh, John A. y Chartrand, Tanya L. (1999). "The unbearable automaticity of being." American Psychologist, 54(7), 462-479. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.462
Barkow, Jerome H., Cosmides, Leda y Tooby, John (Eds.) (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195060232.001.0001
Bateson, Melissa, Nettle, Daniel y Roberts, Gilbert (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2(3), 412-414. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2006.0509 PMid:17148417 PMCid:PMC1686213
Bechara, Antoine, Damásio, Antonio R., Damásio, Hanna y Anderson, Steven W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50(1-3), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3
Berger, Jonah, Meredith, Marc y Wheeler, S. Christian (2008). Contextual priming: Where people vote affects how they vote. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 8846-8849. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0711988105 PMid:18574152 PMCid:PMC2449328
Bloom, Paul (2013). Just babies: The origins of good and evil. Random House.
Brosnan, Sarah F. y de Waal, Frans B. M. (2003). Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature, 425(6955), 297-299. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01963 PMid:13679918
Buss, David M. (2019). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429061417
Churchland, Patricia Smith (2011). Braintrust: What neuroscience tells us about morality? Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400838080
Cosmides, Leda y Tooby, John (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. En Jerome H. Barkow, Leda Cosmides y John Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 151-192). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195060232.003.0004
Damásio, Antonio R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. Quill.
Darley, John M. y Batson, C. Daniel (1973). From Jerusalem to Jericho: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(1), 100-108. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034449
Devine, Patricia G., Forscher, Patrick S., Austin, Anthony J. y Cox, William T. L. (2012). Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1267-1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.06.003 PMid:23524616 PMCid:PMC3603687
De Waal, Frans B. M. (1996). Good natured: The origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674033177
De Waal, Frans B. M. (2006). Primates and philosophers: How morality evolved. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400830336
De Waal, Frans B. M. y Berger, M. L. (2000). Payment for labour in monkeys. Nature, 404(6778), 563. https://doi.org/10.1038/35007138 PMid:10766228
Doris, John M. y Stich, Stephen P. (2005). As a matter of fact: Empirical perspectives on ethics. En Frank Jackson y Michael Smith (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of contemporary philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Fitzgerald, Chloe, Martin, Angela, Hurst, Samia y Berner, Delphine (2019). Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real world contexts: A systematic review. BMC Psychology, 7, 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-019-0299-7 PMid:31097028 PMCid:PMC6524213
Gilovich, Thomas, Griffin, Dale W. y Kahneman, Daniel (Eds.). (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808098
Greene, Joshua D. (2005). Cognitive neuroscience and the structure of the moral mind. En Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence y Stephen Stich (Eds.), The innate mind: Structure and content (pp. 347-373). Oxford University Press.
Greene, Joshua D. (2008). The secret joke of Kant's soul. En Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology, vol. 3. MIT Press.
Greene, Joshua D. (2014). Beyond point-and-shoot morality: Why cognitive (neuro) science matters for ethics. Ethics, 124(4), 695-726. https://doi.org/10.1086/675875 PMid:24083046
Greene, Joshua D., Cushman, Fiery A., Stewart, Laura E., Lowenberg, Kelly, Nystrom, Leigh E. y Cohen, Jonathan D. (2009). Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment. Cognition, 111(3), 364-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.001 PMid:19375075 PMCid:PMC4334407
Greene, Joshua D. y Haidt, Jonathan (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 517-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)02011-9 PMid:12475712 PMCid:PMC4334407
Greene, Joshua D., Sommerville, R. Brian, Nystrom, Leigh E., Darley, John M. y Cohen, Jonathan D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105-2108. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872 PMid:11557895 PMCid:PMC1693452
Haidt, Jonathan (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814-834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814 PMid:11699120
Haidt, Jonathan (2013). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion (Reprint). Vintage.
Haidt, Jonathan y Bjorklund, Fredrik (2008). Social intuitionists answer six questions about morality. En Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology. Vol. 2: The cognitive science of morality (pp. 181-217). MIT Press.
Haidt, Jonathan, Koller, Silvia H. y Dias, Maria G. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 613-628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.613 PMid:8229648
Hauser, Marc D., Cushman, Fiery A., Young, Liane, Jin, Kang-Xing y Mikhail, John (2007). A dissociation between moral judgments and justifications. Mind y Language, 22(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00297.x
Helzer, Erik G. y Pizarro, David A. (2011). Dirty liberals! Reminders of physical cleanliness influence moral and political attitudes. Psychological Science, 22(4), 517-522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611402514 PMid:21421934
Horowitz, Tamara (1998). Philosophical intuitions and psychological theory. En Michael R. DePaul y William Ramsey (Eds.), Rethinking intuition: The psychology of intuition and its role in philosophical inquiry (pp. 143-158). Rowman and Littlefield.
Isen, Alice M. y Levin, Paula F. (1972). Effect of feeling good on helping: Cookies and kindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(3), 384-388. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032317 PMid:5060754
Jenni, Karen E. y Loewenstein, George (1997). Explaining the identifiable victim effect. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14(3), 235-257. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007740225484
Kahneman, Daniel (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kelly, Daniel, Machery, Edouard, y Mallon, Ron (2010). Race and racial cognition. En John M. Doris y The Moral Psychology Research Group (Eds.), The moral psychology handbook (pp. 433-472). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199582143.003.0014
Kelly, Daniel y Roedder, Erica (2008). Racial cognition and the ethics of implicit bias. Philosophy Compass, 3(3), 522-540. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2008.00138.x
Kohlberg, Lawrence (1968). The child as moral philosopher. Psychology Today, 2(9), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1037/e400132009-002
Kohlberg, Lawrence (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. En David Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347-480). Rand McNally.
Kohlberg, Lawrence, Levine, Charles y Hewer, Alexandra (1983). Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics. Karger.
Lai, Calvin K., Hoffman, Kelly M. y Nosek, Brian A. (2014). Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(4), 1765-1785. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036769
Madva, Alex (2019). Social psychology, phenomenology, and the indeterminate content of unreflective racial bias. En Emily S. Lee, (Ed.), Race as phenomena: Between phenomenology and philosophy of race (pp. 87-106). Rowman y Littlefield International.
Mathews, Kenneth E. y Cannon, Lawrence K. (1975). Environmental noise level as a determinant of helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(4), 571-577. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.4.571
Moll, Jorge, Oliveira-Souza, Ricardo y Eslinger, Paul J. (2003). Morals and the human brain: A working model. NeuroReport, 14(3), 299-305. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200302100-00001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200302100-00001 PMid:12598722
Nisbett, Richard E. y Ross, Lee (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Prentice-Hall.
Piaget, Jean (1965). The moral judgment of the child. (Trabajo original publicado en 1932). Free Press.
Preston, Stephanie D. y de Waal, Frans B. M. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1), 1-71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02000018 PMid:12625087
Prinz, Jesse J. (2007). The emotional construction of morals. Oxford University Press.
Richerson, Peter J. y Boyd, Robert (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226712130.001.0001
Sauer, Hanno (2017). Moral judgements as educated intuitions. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10928.001.0001
Schnall, Simone, Haidt, Jonathan, Clore, Gerald L. y Jordan, Alexander H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1069-1109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208317771 PMid:18505801 PMCid:PMC2562923
Singer, Peter (2011). The expanding circle: Ethics, evolution, and moral progress. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400838431
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter P. (2005). Moral intuitionism meets empirical psychology. En Terence Horgan y Mark Timmons (Eds.), Metaethics after Moore (pp. 339-365). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199269914.003.0016
Small, Deborah A., Loewenstein, George y Slovic, Paul (2007). Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(2), 143-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.01.005
Sober, Elliott (1994). From a biological point of view: Essays in evolutionary philosophy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511624940
Sober, Elliott y Wilson, David Sloan (1998). Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, Michael (2009). Why we cooperate. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8470.001.0001
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
© CSIC. Los originales publicados en las ediciones impresa y electrónica de esta Revista son propiedad del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, siendo necesario citar la procedencia en cualquier reproducción parcial o total.
Salvo indicación contraria, todos los contenidos de la edición electrónica se distribuyen bajo una licencia de uso y distribución “Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional ” (CC BY 4.0). Consulte la versión informativa y el texto legal de la licencia. Esta circunstancia ha de hacerse constar expresamente de esta forma cuando sea necesario.
No se autoriza el depósito en repositorios, páginas web personales o similares de cualquier otra versión distinta a la publicada por el editor.
Datos de los fondos
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Números de la subvención 2022.08566.CEECIND/CP1725/CT0054
