Algorithmic democracy: a new structural change in public opinion?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2022.67.17Keywords:
Algorithmic democracy, Public opinion, Big data, Social bots, Artificial intelligence, Participation spacesAbstract
The aim of this paper is to confront the concept of public opinion with the reality and expectations of a digitalised society in order to analyse whether the current algorithmic colonisation calls for a new structural change of public opinion or rather the withdrawal of this concept. Massive data and metadata have become a double-edged sword for the digitally hyper-connected democratic society. While, on the one hand, the incredible potential of big data and its different techniques and technologies of data and metadata exploitation make it a coveted product for the system of institutions that make up both the state and civil society; on the other hand, the high negative impacts that its instrumental and irresponsible use is producing and may produce, make big data a controversial and highly criticised tool that distances us from any attempt to build a digital citizenship. Although algorithmic democracy does not rely solely on public opinion, the aim is to show the incompatibility between artificial public opinion and democracy. Our guiding thread is the Habermasian concept of public opinion, since it is precisely the strength of civil society, through the design of spaces for participation within it, from which we can extract the necessary potential to confront the current algorithmic colonisation, to recover an autonomous and critical deliberation without which there is no public opinion and, therefore, no democracy.
Downloads
References
Barabási, A. L. y Ruppert, P. (2018). "Bots and Their Influence During the Mexican Presidential Election - A Network Science Perspective". Botometer [Blog] , June 18.
Bessi, A. y Ferrara, E. (2016). "Social bots distort the 2016 U.S. Presidential election online discussion". First Monday 21 (11), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i11.7090
Brennan J. (2018). Contra la democracia, Barcelona: Planeta.
Cadwalladr, C. (2017). "The great British Brexit robbery: how our democracy was hijacked". The Guardian, May 7.
Calvo, P. (2019a). "Democracia algorítmica: consideraciones éticas sobre la dataficiación de la esfera pública", Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia (74), 5-30.
Calvo, P. (2019b). "Etificación, la transformación digital de lo moral", Kriterion. Revista de Filosofía (144), 671-688. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-512x2019n14409pc
Calvo, P. (2020). "The ethics of Smart City (EoSC): moral implications of hyperconnectivity, algorithmization and the datafication of urban digital society". Ethics Inf Technol (22), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-019-09523-0
Calvo, P. (2022). "Gemelos digitales y Democracia". Revista del CLAD. Reforma y Democracia (83).
Caplan, R. y Boyd, D. (2016). "Who controls the public sphere in an era of algorithms. Mediation, Automation, Power". Data & Society, May 13.
Conill, J. (2019). Intimidad corporal y persona humana. De Nietzsche a Ortega y Zubiri. Madrid: Tecnos.
Cortina, A. (1998). Hasta un pueblo de demonios: ética pública y sociedad. Madrid: Taurus.
Cortina, A. (2022). "Los desafíos éticos del transhumanismo". Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica, 78 (298), 471-483. https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v78.i298.y2022.009
Cortina, A., Conill, J. y García-Marzá, D. (eds.) (2008). Public reason and applied ethics: The ways of practical reason in a pluralist society. New York: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
Cresci, S., Di Pietro, R., Petrocchi, M., Spognardi, A. y Tesconi, M. (2015). "Fame for sale: Efficient detection of fake Twitter followers". Decision Support Systems (80), 56-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.09.003
Dijck, J. van (2013). The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001
Dijck, J. van (2014). "Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology". Surveillance & Society 12 (2), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776
Donati, P. (2019). Sociología relacional de lo humano. Barañain: EUNSA.
Eubanks, V. (2021). La automatización de la desigualdad: herramientas de tecnología avanzada para supervisar y castigar a los pobres. Madrid: Capitán Swing.
Ferrara, E. (2017). "Disinformation and social bot operations in the run up to the 2017 French presidential election". First Monday, 22(8), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i8.8005
Ferrara, E. (2020). "Bots, Elections, and Social Media: A Brief Overview". En: Shu K.; Wang S.; Lee D. y Liu H. (eds.), Disinformation, Misinformation, and Fake News in Social Media. Lecture Notes in Social Networks, Cham: Springer, pp. 95-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42699-6_6
Ferrara, E.; Varol, O.; Davis, C.; Menczer, F. y Flammini, A. (2016). "El auge de los bots sociales". Comunicaciones de la ACM, 59(7), 96-104. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818717
Finger, L. (2015). "Do Evil - The Business of Social Media Bots". Forbes, February 17.
García-Marzá, D. (2012). "Kant's Principle of Publicity", Kant-Studien. Philosophische Zeitschrift der Kant-Gesellsschaft" (103), 96-113. https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2012-0005
García-Marzá, D. (2016a): "Neuroética aplicada: las consecuencias prácticas del neuropositivismo", Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica, 72 (273), 881-900. https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v72.i273.y2016.007
García-Marzá, D. (2016b). "Enfoques mesodeliberativos: sobre la articulación institucional en las democracias deliberativas". Isegoría (54), 147-170. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2016.054.06
García-Marzá, D. (2020). "Contra el nuevo revisionismo democrático: el alcance del valor moral de la democracia en K.-O. Apel". ethic@-An international Journal for Moral Philosophy, 19(3), 568-591. https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2020v19n3p568
García-Marzá, D. y Calvo, P (2022). Algorithmic democracy: A critical perspective from deliberative democracy. Cham: Springer.
Gorodnichenko, Y.; Pham, T. y Talavera, O. (2021). "Social Media, Sentiment and Public Opinions: Evidence from #Brexit and #USElection". European Economic Review, 136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103772
González, E. y Calvo, P. (2022). "Ethically governing artificial intelligence in the field of scientific research and innovation". Heliyon (8), e08946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08946 PMid:35243068 PMCid:PMC8860912
Habermas, J. (1984). Ciencia y técnica como ideología. Madrid: Tecnos.
Habermas, J. (1987). Teoría de la Acción comunicativa. Madrid: Taurus.
Habermas, J. (1994). Historia y crítica de la opinión pública. México: G. Gili.
Habermas, J. (1998). Facticidad y validez. Madrid: Trotta.
Habermas, J. (2009), ¡Ay, Europa! Madrid: Trotta
Habermas, J. (2021). "Überlegungen und Hypothesen zu einem erneuten Strukturwandel der politischen Öffentlichkeit". En: Seeliger, M. y Sevignani, S. (eds.), Ein neuer Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit?, Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 470-500. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748912187-470
Hagen, L. M.; Wieland, M. e In der Au, A.-M. (2017). "Algorithmischer Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Wie die automatische Selektion im Social Web die politische Kommunikation verändert und welche Gefahren dies birgt". Medienjournal-Zeitschrift für Medien-und Kommunkiationsforschung 41(2), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.24989/medienjournal.v41i2.1476
Hajli, N.; Saeed, U.; Tajvidi, M. y Shirazi, F. (2021). "Social Bots and the Spread of Disinformation in Social Media: The Challenges of Artificial Intelligence". British Journal of Management 33(3), 1238-1253. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12554
Harper, T. (2017). "The big data public and its problems: Big data and the structural transformation of the public sphere". New Media & Society 19(9), 1424-1439. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816642167
Honneth, A. (2009). Crítica del poder. Madrid: Machado Libros. https://doi.org/10.5211/iys.6.article11
Howard, P. N.; Kollanyi, B.; Bradshaw, S. y Neudert, L. M. (2017). "Social media, news and political information during the US election: Was polarizing content concentrated on swing states".
Innerarity, D. y Colomina, C. (2020). "La verdad en las democracias algorítmicas". Revista CIDOB d'afers internacionals (124), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.24241/rcai.2020.124.1.11
Kalil, T. (2012). "Big Data is a Big Deal". The Whitehouse President Barack Obama. Washington: The Whitehouse. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2012/03/29/big-data-big-deal
Keane, J. (2018). Vida y muerte de la democracia. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
König, P. D. y Wenzelburger, G. (2022). "Between technochauvinism and human-centrism: Can algorithms improve decision-making in democratic politics?". European Political Science (21), 132-149. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-020-00298-3
Lagares, N.; López, P. C.; Jaráiz, E. y Rivera, J. M. (2021). "La comunidad digital y el uso político de las redes sociales: elecciones generales del año 2019 en España". Araucaria 23(48), 235-273. https://doi.org/10.12795/araucaria.2021.i48.11
Larson, C. (2018). "Who needs democracy when you have data?". MIT Technology Review, 121(5), 50-55.
Manfredi, J.; Amado, A. y Waisbord, S. (2021). "Presidential Twitter in the face of COVID-19: Between populism and pop politics". Comunicar (66), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.3916/C66-2021-07
Marr, B. (2015). Big Data - Using SMART Big Data, Analytics and Metrics to Make Better Decisions and Improve Performance. UK, Wiley.
Matsumoto, T. (2018). The Day AI Becomes God. The Singularity will Save Humanity. Cambridge (NZ): Media Tectonics.
Mayer-Schoenberger, V. y Cukier, K. (2013). Big Data. A Revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Londres: John Murray Publishers.
Minc, A. (1995). La borrachera democrática. El nuevo poder de la opinión pública. Madrid: Temas de Hoy.
Molina, M. D.; Sundar, Sh.; Le, Th. y Lee, D. (2017). "'Fake News' Is Not Simply False Information: A Concept Explication and Taxonomy of Online Content". American Behavioral Scientist 65(2), 180-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219878224
Napoli, P. M. (2014). "Automated media: An institutional theory perspective on algorithmic media production and consumption". Communication theory 24(3), 340-360. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12039
Offe, C., y Preuss, U. (1990). "Instituciones democráticas y recursos morales". Isegoría, (2), 45-74. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.1990.i2.390
O'Neal, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Broadway Books.
Pastor-Galindo, J.; Zago, M.; Nespoli, P.; López, S., Huertas, A.; Gil, M.; Ruiperez-Valiente, J. A.; Martínez, G. y Gómez, F. (2020). "Spotting political social bots in Twitter: A use case of the 2019 Spanish general election". arXiv. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSM.2020.3031573
Pérez-Díaz, V. (1997). La esfera pública y la sociedad civil. Madrid: Taurus.
Ritzer, G. (1995). Teoría sociológica contemporánea. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
Runciman, D. (2019). Así termina la democracia. Barcelona: Paidós
Sartori, G. (1992). Elementos de teoría política. Madrid: Alianza.
Saura, C. (2022). "El lado oscuro de las GAFAM: monopolización de los datos y pérdida de privacidad". Veritas. Revista de Filosofía y Teología (52), 28-46.
Scola, N. (2013). "Obama, the 'big data' president". The Washington Post, June 14.
Tocqueville, A. de (1989 [1840]), Democracy in America, Volume 2. New York: Vintage Books.
Vayena, E. y Gasser, U. (2016). "Strictly Bioomedical? Stretching the Ethics of the Big Data Ecosystem in Biomedicine". En: Mittelstadt, Brent D. y Floridi, Luciano (eds.), The Ethics of Biomedical Big Data, Cham: Springer, pp. 17-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33525-4_2
Woolley, S. C. y Howard, P. N. (2018). Computational Propaganda: Political Parties, Politicians, and Political Manipulation on Social Media. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190931407.001.0001
Yang, K.-C.; Varol, O.; Davis, C. A.; Ferrara, E.; Flammini, A. y Menczer, F. (2019). "Arming the public with artificial intelligence to counter social bots". Human Behavior & Emerging Technologies 1(1), 48-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.115
Zuboff, Sh. (2020). La era del capitalismo de la vigilancia. La lucha por un futuro humano frente a las nuevas fronteras del poder. Barcelona: Paidós.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
Funding data
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Grant numbers PID2019-109078RB-C21
H2020 European Research Council
Grant numbers 872360
Generalitat Valenciana
Grant numbers CIPROM/2021/072