Tikanga Māori and the rights of nature: synergies and challenges

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2025.72.1675

Keywords:

Tikanga Māori, rights of nature, legal personhood, Aotearoa, Indigenous worldview

Abstract


From rising sea levels to shifting weather, patterns the effects climate change are global. Nonetheless, Indigenous Peoples are the most vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change and yet by implementing their Indigenous worldview Indigenous Peoples are providing solutions to ameliorate the adverse effects of climate change. Unsurprisingly there is a desire to understand these Indigenous solutions. In this context, this article examines the relationship between the Māori indigenous worldview and the rights of nature, emphasizing how these concepts converge to address environmental challenges in Aotearoa, New Zealand. Māori traditions and practices provide solutions grounded in a relational ethic that acknowledges the interdependence of humans and nature. The text discusses emblematic cases, such as granting legal personhood to rivers and natural territories, illustrating how these initiatives reflect Māori values like kaitiakitanga (guardianship) and whakapapa (ancestral connection). Finally, exploring initiatives such as legal personality exemplifies differences and similarities between an Indigenous worldview and rights to nature and accounts for the advantages and challenges of integrating indigenous perspectives into contemporary legislative and political frameworks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Benton, Richard, Frame, Alexander, y Meredith, Paul (2013). Te Mātāpunenga: A compendium of references to the concepts and institutions of Māori customary law. Victoria University Press.

Cribb, Miriama, Macpherson, Elizabeth y Borchgrevink, Axel (2024). Beyond legal personhood for the Whanganui River: Collaboration and pluralism in implementing the Te Awa Tupua Act. The International Journal of Human Rights, 28(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2024.2314532

Cullinan, Cormac (2003). Wild law: A manifesto for Earth justice. Chelsea Green.

Douglas, William O. (1972). Dissenting Opinion. Case: Sierra Club v. Morton. EEUU Supreme CourtEn Stone, Christopher D., Should trees have standing?: Toward legal rights for natural objects (pp. 73-84)William Kaufmann, Inc.

Durie, Mason (1998). Te Mana, Te Kāwanatanga: The politics of Māori self-determination. Oxford University Press.

Durie, Mason (2005). Nga Tai Matatū: Tides of Māori endurance. Oxford University Press.

Finlayson, Christopher (2022). Legal personhood of natural resources: The potential for ocean jurisdiction (Global Studies Research Series Research Report No. 8).

Maloney, Michelle y Burdon, Peter (2014). Wild law-In practice: Law, justice and ecology. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203798911

Maragia, Bosire (2006). The paradox of indigenous sustainability and the pursuit of sustainability in post-colonial societies: Is indigenous knowledge all that is needed? Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 18, 197-218. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/gintenlr18&div=12&id=&page=

Morris, James D. K., y Ruru, Jacinta. (2010). Giving voice to rivers: Legal personality as a vehicle for natural objects. Australian Indigenous Law Review, 14(2). Disponible aquí: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26423181

Nash, Roderick Frazier (1989). The rights of nature: A history of environmental ethics. University of Wisconsin Press.

New Zealand Law Commission (2001). Māori customs and values in New Zealand law (Study Paper 9). https://www.lawcom.govt.nz/assets/Publications/StudyPapers/NZLC-SP9.pdf

Richardson, Benjamin J. (2001). Indigenous peoples, international law and sustainability. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 10(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9388.00256

Ruru, Jacinta (2018). Listening to Papatūānuku: A call to reform water law. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 48(2-3), 215-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2018.1442358

Salmond, Anne (2018). Rivers as ancestors and other realities: Governance of waterways in Aotearoa New Zealand. En Lara Te Aho, Mike Humphries y Brendan Martin (Eds.), ResponsAbility: Law and governance for living well with the Earth (pp. 183-192). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429467622-13

Salmond, John William (1907). Jurisprudence: The theory of the law (2nd ed.). Stevens and Haynes.

Sanders, Katherine (2018). Beyond human ownership: Property, power and legal personality for nature in Aotearoa New Zealand. Journal of Environmental Law, 30(2), 207-234. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4036955

Stephens, Māmari (2022). Kei a Koe, Chair! The norms of Tikanga and the role of Hui as a Māori constitutional tradition. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 53(3), 459-481. https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v53i3.8005

Stone, Christopher D. (1972). Should trees have standing? Toward legal rights for natural objects. Southern California Law Review, 45, 450-501. https://iseethics.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/stone-christopher-d-should-trees-have-standing.pdf

Stone, Christopher D. (2017). Should trees have standing?-Toward legal rights for natural objects. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315094427-13

Tănăsescu, Mihnea (2022). Understanding the rights of nature: A critical introduction. Transcript Verlag.

Tănăsescu, Mihnea, Macpherson, Elizabeth, Jefferson, Daniel y Torres Ventura, Juan (2024). Rights of nature and rivers in Ecuador's Constitutional Court. The International Journal of Human Rights, 28(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2024.2314536

Toki, Valmaine (2025). Legal personhood as an option to better protect Māori intangible taonga: Friend, foe, or strategic ally? En Jane Houghton & David Williams (Eds.), Intellectual property. Auckland University Press.

Referencias normativas

Constitución de la República del Ecuador (2008). Publicada en el Registro Oficial No. 449 de 20 de octubre de 2008. https://www.asambleanacional.gob.ec/sites/default/files/documents/old/constitucion_de_bolsillo.pdf

Corte Constitucional de Colombia (2016). Sentencia T-622, de 10 de noviembre de 2016 (Río Atrato). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2016/t-622-16.htm

Corte Suprema de Justicia de Colombia (2018). Sentencia STC4360-2018, de 5 de abril de 2018.

Corte Suprema de Nueva Zelanda (2012). Sentencia dentro del caso Takamore v Clarke, NZSC 116. https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/assets/cases/2012/2012-NZSC-116.pdf

Corte Suprema de Nueva Zelanda (2021). Sentencia dentro del caso Trans-Tasman Resources Ltd v Taranaki-Whanganui Conservation Board, NZSC 127, de 30 de septiembre de 2021. https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/assets/cases/2021/2021-NZSC-127.pdf

Corte Suprema de Nueva Zelanda (2022). Sentencia dentro del caso Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei Trust v Attorney General, NZHC 843, del 28 de abril del 2022, párr. 31. https://assets.maorilawreview.co.nz/ngati_whatua_orakei_trust_v_attorney-general_no.4_2022_nzhc_843.pdf

Corte Suprema de Nueva Zelanda (2022). Sentencia dentro del caso Peter Hugh McGregor Ellis v R, NZSC 115, del 7 de octubre de 2022. https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/assets/cases/2022/2022-NZSC-115.pdf

Parlamento de Nueva Zelanda, Fisheries Act 1996. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1996/0088/latest/DLM394192.html

Parlamento de Nueva Zelanda, Fisheries (Kaimoana Customary Fishing) Regulations 1998; Offences and Penalties. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/1998/0434/43.0/DLM268677.html

Parlamento de Nueva Zelanda, Te Urewera Act, de 27 de julio de 2014. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2014/0051/latest/whole.html

Parlamento de Nueva Zelanda, Te Awa Tupua Act (Whanganui River Claims Settlement), de 20 de marzo de 2017. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2017/0007/latest/whole.html

Parlamento de Nueva Zelanda, Te Ture Whakatupua mō te Kāhui Tupua (Taranaki Maunga Collective Redress Act), de 1 de febrero de 2025. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2025/0001/21.0/LMS899773.html

Tribunal de Waitangi (1988). Muriwhenua fishing report (Wai 22). https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/WT/wt_DOC_68478237/Muriwhenua%20Fishing%20Report%201988.compressed.pdf

Tribunal de Waitangi. (1992). Ngāi Tahu sea fisheries report (Wai 27). https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/WT/wt_DOC_68472628/NT%20Sea%20Fisheries%20W.pdf

Tribunal de Waitangi (1992). Report on the fisheries settlement (Wai 307). https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/WT/wt_DOC_68345292/Fisheries%20Settlement%201992.pdf

Tribunal de Waitangi (1999). The Whanganui River report. https://ngatangatatiaki.co.nz/assets/Uploads/Important-Documents/Whanganui-River-Report-1999.pdf

Tribunal Superior de Auckland (1998). Te Waka Hi Ika o Te Arawa v Treaty of Waitangi Fisheries Commission, de 4 de agosto de 1998 (CP 395/93).

Published

2025-07-08

How to Cite

Toki, V. (2025). Tikanga Māori and the rights of nature: synergies and challenges. Isegoría, (72), 1675. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2025.72.1675

Issue

Section

Articles