Tikanga Māori and the rights of nature: synergies and challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2025.72.1675Keywords:
Tikanga Māori, rights of nature, legal personhood, Aotearoa, Indigenous worldviewAbstract
From rising sea levels to shifting weather, patterns the effects climate change are global. Nonetheless, Indigenous Peoples are the most vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change and yet by implementing their Indigenous worldview Indigenous Peoples are providing solutions to ameliorate the adverse effects of climate change. Unsurprisingly there is a desire to understand these Indigenous solutions. In this context, this article examines the relationship between the Māori indigenous worldview and the rights of nature, emphasizing how these concepts converge to address environmental challenges in Aotearoa, New Zealand. Māori traditions and practices provide solutions grounded in a relational ethic that acknowledges the interdependence of humans and nature. The text discusses emblematic cases, such as granting legal personhood to rivers and natural territories, illustrating how these initiatives reflect Māori values like kaitiakitanga (guardianship) and whakapapa (ancestral connection). Finally, exploring initiatives such as legal personality exemplifies differences and similarities between an Indigenous worldview and rights to nature and accounts for the advantages and challenges of integrating indigenous perspectives into contemporary legislative and political frameworks.
Downloads
References
Benton, Richard, Frame, Alexander, y Meredith, Paul (2013). Te Mātāpunenga: A compendium of references to the concepts and institutions of Māori customary law. Victoria University Press.
Cribb, Miriama, Macpherson, Elizabeth y Borchgrevink, Axel (2024). Beyond legal personhood for the Whanganui River: Collaboration and pluralism in implementing the Te Awa Tupua Act. The International Journal of Human Rights, 28(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2024.2314532
Cullinan, Cormac (2003). Wild law: A manifesto for Earth justice. Chelsea Green.
Douglas, William O. (1972). Dissenting Opinion. Case: Sierra Club v. Morton. EEUU Supreme CourtEn Stone, Christopher D., Should trees have standing?: Toward legal rights for natural objects (pp. 73-84)William Kaufmann, Inc.
Durie, Mason (1998). Te Mana, Te Kāwanatanga: The politics of Māori self-determination. Oxford University Press.
Durie, Mason (2005). Nga Tai Matatū: Tides of Māori endurance. Oxford University Press.
Finlayson, Christopher (2022). Legal personhood of natural resources: The potential for ocean jurisdiction (Global Studies Research Series Research Report No. 8).
Maloney, Michelle y Burdon, Peter (2014). Wild law-In practice: Law, justice and ecology. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203798911
Maragia, Bosire (2006). The paradox of indigenous sustainability and the pursuit of sustainability in post-colonial societies: Is indigenous knowledge all that is needed? Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 18, 197-218. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/gintenlr18&div=12&id=&page=
Morris, James D. K., y Ruru, Jacinta. (2010). Giving voice to rivers: Legal personality as a vehicle for natural objects. Australian Indigenous Law Review, 14(2). Disponible aquí: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26423181
Nash, Roderick Frazier (1989). The rights of nature: A history of environmental ethics. University of Wisconsin Press.
New Zealand Law Commission (2001). Māori customs and values in New Zealand law (Study Paper 9). https://www.lawcom.govt.nz/assets/Publications/StudyPapers/NZLC-SP9.pdf
Richardson, Benjamin J. (2001). Indigenous peoples, international law and sustainability. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 10(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9388.00256
Ruru, Jacinta (2018). Listening to Papatūānuku: A call to reform water law. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 48(2-3), 215-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2018.1442358
Salmond, Anne (2018). Rivers as ancestors and other realities: Governance of waterways in Aotearoa New Zealand. En Lara Te Aho, Mike Humphries y Brendan Martin (Eds.), ResponsAbility: Law and governance for living well with the Earth (pp. 183-192). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429467622-13
Salmond, John William (1907). Jurisprudence: The theory of the law (2nd ed.). Stevens and Haynes.
Sanders, Katherine (2018). Beyond human ownership: Property, power and legal personality for nature in Aotearoa New Zealand. Journal of Environmental Law, 30(2), 207-234. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4036955
Stephens, Māmari (2022). Kei a Koe, Chair! The norms of Tikanga and the role of Hui as a Māori constitutional tradition. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 53(3), 459-481. https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v53i3.8005
Stone, Christopher D. (1972). Should trees have standing? Toward legal rights for natural objects. Southern California Law Review, 45, 450-501. https://iseethics.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/stone-christopher-d-should-trees-have-standing.pdf
Stone, Christopher D. (2017). Should trees have standing?-Toward legal rights for natural objects. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315094427-13
Tănăsescu, Mihnea (2022). Understanding the rights of nature: A critical introduction. Transcript Verlag.
Tănăsescu, Mihnea, Macpherson, Elizabeth, Jefferson, Daniel y Torres Ventura, Juan (2024). Rights of nature and rivers in Ecuador's Constitutional Court. The International Journal of Human Rights, 28(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2024.2314536
Toki, Valmaine (2025). Legal personhood as an option to better protect Māori intangible taonga: Friend, foe, or strategic ally? En Jane Houghton & David Williams (Eds.), Intellectual property. Auckland University Press.
Referencias normativas
Constitución de la República del Ecuador (2008). Publicada en el Registro Oficial No. 449 de 20 de octubre de 2008. https://www.asambleanacional.gob.ec/sites/default/files/documents/old/constitucion_de_bolsillo.pdf
Corte Constitucional de Colombia (2016). Sentencia T-622, de 10 de noviembre de 2016 (Río Atrato). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2016/t-622-16.htm
Corte Suprema de Justicia de Colombia (2018). Sentencia STC4360-2018, de 5 de abril de 2018.
Corte Suprema de Nueva Zelanda (2012). Sentencia dentro del caso Takamore v Clarke, NZSC 116. https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/assets/cases/2012/2012-NZSC-116.pdf
Corte Suprema de Nueva Zelanda (2021). Sentencia dentro del caso Trans-Tasman Resources Ltd v Taranaki-Whanganui Conservation Board, NZSC 127, de 30 de septiembre de 2021. https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/assets/cases/2021/2021-NZSC-127.pdf
Corte Suprema de Nueva Zelanda (2022). Sentencia dentro del caso Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei Trust v Attorney General, NZHC 843, del 28 de abril del 2022, párr. 31. https://assets.maorilawreview.co.nz/ngati_whatua_orakei_trust_v_attorney-general_no.4_2022_nzhc_843.pdf
Corte Suprema de Nueva Zelanda (2022). Sentencia dentro del caso Peter Hugh McGregor Ellis v R, NZSC 115, del 7 de octubre de 2022. https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/assets/cases/2022/2022-NZSC-115.pdf
Parlamento de Nueva Zelanda, Fisheries Act 1996. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1996/0088/latest/DLM394192.html
Parlamento de Nueva Zelanda, Fisheries (Kaimoana Customary Fishing) Regulations 1998; Offences and Penalties. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/1998/0434/43.0/DLM268677.html
Parlamento de Nueva Zelanda, Te Urewera Act, de 27 de julio de 2014. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2014/0051/latest/whole.html
Parlamento de Nueva Zelanda, Te Awa Tupua Act (Whanganui River Claims Settlement), de 20 de marzo de 2017. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2017/0007/latest/whole.html
Parlamento de Nueva Zelanda, Te Ture Whakatupua mō te Kāhui Tupua (Taranaki Maunga Collective Redress Act), de 1 de febrero de 2025. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2025/0001/21.0/LMS899773.html
Tribunal de Waitangi (1988). Muriwhenua fishing report (Wai 22). https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/WT/wt_DOC_68478237/Muriwhenua%20Fishing%20Report%201988.compressed.pdf
Tribunal de Waitangi. (1992). Ngāi Tahu sea fisheries report (Wai 27). https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/WT/wt_DOC_68472628/NT%20Sea%20Fisheries%20W.pdf
Tribunal de Waitangi (1992). Report on the fisheries settlement (Wai 307). https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/WT/wt_DOC_68345292/Fisheries%20Settlement%201992.pdf
Tribunal de Waitangi (1999). The Whanganui River report. https://ngatangatatiaki.co.nz/assets/Uploads/Important-Documents/Whanganui-River-Report-1999.pdf
Tribunal Superior de Auckland (1998). Te Waka Hi Ika o Te Arawa v Treaty of Waitangi Fisheries Commission, de 4 de agosto de 1998 (CP 395/93).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.






