Condiciones de posibilidad para una justicia global
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2004.i30.477Abstract
Recognition, as a constitutive part of subjectivity, is a basic need for people as well as for States. The terms of international relationships imposed by a great number of international credit and commerce institutions contradict and undermine such recognition, by means of policies that result in segregation and poverty in the poorest countries. Breaking such logic seems to be the way to enable the existence of conditions of global justice based on terms of reciprocal recognition. A prudential argument is the first step in this process; mid and long-term benefit would be the only rational motivation for international institutions to enable such an openness that would ensure reciprocal recognition. However, this argument is not sufficient, and the objective of a radical inclusion affecting all regions of the planet requires a moral argument based on the idea of equal dignity, inherent to every person. Global justice and its counterpart, local justice, will only be possible through the combination of these two arguments, which would make the existence of a logic of reciprocal recognition possible, thus enabling justice.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2004-06-30
How to Cite
Pereira, G. (2004). Condiciones de posibilidad para una justicia global. Isegoría, (30), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2004.i30.477
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2004 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.