Liberalismo y derecho a la inmigración
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2002.i26.570Abstract
Today, most liberal theorists either do not plead for freedom of migration or clearly reject it. In my view, it contradicts not only the traditional natural law theories, but also today's liberal principles of justice such as Rawls's difference principle. In a thought experiment, I compare the imaginary situation, in which immigration were allowed to everybody, while no social and health benefits were provided for immigrants, to the actual situation, in which immigration from the third world is allowed only to a few people, but social benefits are granted to the immigrants. Against the current view, I show that for the worst-off the actual situation is worse than the imaginary situation.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2002 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
