Liberalismo y derecho a la inmigración
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2002.i26.570Abstract
Today, most liberal theorists either do not plead for freedom of migration or clearly reject it. In my view, it contradicts not only the traditional natural law theories, but also today's liberal principles of justice such as Rawls's difference principle. In a thought experiment, I compare the imaginary situation, in which immigration were allowed to everybody, while no social and health benefits were provided for immigrants, to the actual situation, in which immigration from the third world is allowed only to a few people, but social benefits are granted to the immigrants. Against the current view, I show that for the worst-off the actual situation is worse than the imaginary situation.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2002-06-30
How to Cite
Merle, J. C. (2002). Liberalismo y derecho a la inmigración. Isegoría, (26), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2002.i26.570
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2002 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
