Secularization and critique of modern liberalism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2008.i39.622Keywords:
secularisation, modernity, liberalism, liberal education, theologico-political treatisesAbstract
In the following article, the focus is mainly on the secularisation and critique of modernity that we observe in the work of Leo Strauss. Despite the fact that this philosopher talks about the anti-theological anger of modernists, he finally concedes that Neuzeit novelties are not absolute and also the necessity of noticing a certain continuity regarding Judeo-Christian tradition. One other peculiarity of Straussian interpretation is that he identifies modernity with only one of its trends, that of liberalism. In the article, we analyse the conservative and even reactionary nature of Straussian critique when directed towards modern liberalism. Furthermore, we analyse its differences and convergences with the biggest liberal of the century, Carl Schmitt.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2008-12-30
How to Cite
Rivera García, A. (2008). Secularization and critique of modern liberalism. Isegoría, (39), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2008.i39.622
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2008 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
