Deleuze, Strauss and a gap in the middle of Spinoza
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2010.i42.694Keywords:
Eternity, duration, politics, Spinoza, Deleuze, StraussAbstract
We propose to study the thought of Gilles Deleuze and Leo Strauss from the stand point of the opposed interpretation than this two influential philosophers of the twentieth century have made of the political ontology of Spinoza. Both share a common problematic: how substance and existent modes do relate. But where Strauss makes a call to Revelation and the demand to love one’s neighbour to fulfil the gulf, and avoid that being wise means to expel the suffering of the multitude from the sphere of one’s own life, Deleuze posits an interpretation of the theory of finite modes that allows us to distinguish the stand point of Eternity from that of Duration, without by doing so subjecting finite modes to the random order of encounters, that is, allowing them to find their conatus in divine power.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2010-06-30
How to Cite
Ferreyra, J. (2010). Deleuze, Strauss and a gap in the middle of Spinoza. Isegoría, (42), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2010.i42.694
Issue
Section
Notes and Discussions
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.