Exemplar Validity and Communities of Certainties. Kant, Arendt, Wittgenstein about the Power to Judge Critically
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2017.057.05Keywords:
Politic, Judgment, Certainty, Political Communities, Arendt, WittgensteinAbstract
This article defends that power of judge is a fundamental ability to think politics. The relevance of this capacity is that the structure and function of reflexive judgment, read by hannah Arendt, allow us to explain the difficult balance between shared judgments in communities and the possibility of criticism.
Downloads
References
Arendt, hannah, Between the Past and the Future . Penguin books, nueva York, 2006.
Arendt, hannah, Entre el pasado y el futuro. Ocho ejercicios sobre la reflexión política, (Trad. Ana Poljak), barcelona, Península, 1996
Arendt, hannah, Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy , (Ronald beiner ed. and Interpretative Essay) Chicago, Chicago university Press, 1982.
Arendt, hannah, Responsabilidad y juicio , (Introducción y notas de Jerome Kohn), Barcelona, Paidós, 2007
Azmanova, Albena, The Scandal of Reason. A critical Theory of Political Judgment, New York, Columbia university Press, 2012.
Beiner, Ronald, Political Judgment , Chicago, university of Chicago Press, 1983
Beiner, Ronald y nedelsky, Jennifer (eds.), Judgment, Imagination and Politics, Rowman and Littlefiel, new York, 2001.
Benhabib, Seyla, Situating the Self. Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1992.
Bloor, David, Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge, London, MacMillan,1983. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17273-3 PMCid:PMC1916315
Bloor, David, Wittgenstein: Rules and Institutions . Routledge, 1997. PMCid:PMC2127150
Bloor, David; barnes, barry; henry, John, (comps.), Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge . Athlone and Chicago university Press, 1996.
Connolly, William E., The Terms of Political Discourse, Princeton, new Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1993, [1a.ed. 1974]
Easton, Susan M., Humanist Marxism and Wittgensteinian Social Philosophy, Manchester, Manchester university Press, 1983.
Ferrara, Alessandro, Justice and Judgment, Sage, London, 1999.
Ferrara, Alessandro, La fuerza del ejemplo. Exploraciones del paradigma del juicio, Barcelona, Gedisa, 2008.
Ferrara, Alessandro, The Force of The Example. Explorations in the Paradigm of Judgment, New York, Columbia university Press, 2008. https://doi.org/10.7312/ferr14072
Gunnell, Jonh, Social Inquiry After Wittgenstein and Kuhn. Leaving Everything as It is, New York, Columbia, university Press, 2014
Gallie, W.B., "Essentially Contested Concepts", Proceeding of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, vol. LVI, 1955-1956, pp. 167-198. (Traducido como "Conceptos esencialmente impugnados" por Gustavo Ortíz Millán en Cuadernos de Crítica, núm. 49, UNAM/Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, México, 1998)
Gellner, Ernest, Words and Things: An Examination of, and an Attack on, Linguistic Philosophy, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1959
Gunnell, John "Political Judgment and The Problem of "Criticism from de outside", conferencia presentada en 2014 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 28-31, 2014. SSRn Electronic Journal · January 2014.
Habermas, Jürgen "El concepto de poder en hannah Arendt", en Perfiles filosóficos–políticos (trad.: Manuel Jiménez Redondo), Madrid, Taurus, 2000 PMid:10989622
Heyes, Cressida J., (ed.), The Gramma of Politics . Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 2003.
Janik, Allan, Style, Politics and the Future of Philosophy, Dordrecht (netherlands), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989, Kant, I., Crítica del discernimiento, (Introducción y estudio introductorio de Roberto R. Aramayo y Salvador Mas), Madrid, Mínimo Tránsito, 2003
Lara, María Pía, Narrar el mal. Una teoría posmetafísica del juicio reflexionante, Barcelona, Gedisa, 2009.
Monk, Ray, Ludwig Wittgenstein , barcelona, Anagrama, 1994
Mouffe, Chantal, "Wittgenstein, Political Theory and Democracy" en Polylog: Forum for Intercultural Philosophy 2 (2000). www.polylog.org/them70102/asp01-en.htm.
Mu-oz, María Teresa, "Certezas, prácticas y contextos en Sobre la Certeza . un rechazo al escepticismo desde el naturalismo pragmático-social", David Pérez Chico (Comp.), Wittgenstein y el escepticismo , zaragoza, Prensas universitarias de zaragoza, 2017 (en prensa)
Mu-oz, María Teresa, "El desafío del multiculturalismo", Theoría, núm. 8-9, 1999, pp. 101-110;
Mu-oz, María Teresa, "El juicio político" en C. Pereda, J. Marcone, M.T. Mu-oz y S. Ortiz, Diccionario de Justicia, México, Siglo XXI, 2017.
Mu-oz, María Teresa, "nominalismo epistemológico y relativismo cultural. Acerca de la posibilidad de dar razones", Signos Filosóficos, núm. 5 enero/junio, 2001, pp.143-164.
Mu-oz, María Teresa,Wittgenstein y la articulación lingü.stica de lo público. Un camino de la semántica a la política, México, Instituto Internacional de Filosofía, 2009.
Nyíri, C.,"Wittgenstein´s Later Work in Relation to Conservatism" in b.F. McGuinnes, Wittgenstein and His Times, Chicago, Chicago university Press, 1982.
Passerin D’Entrevés, Maurizio, The Political Philosophy of Hannah Arendt, London/New York, Routledge, 1994.
Pereda, Carlos, Vértigos argumentales , barcelona, uAM/Anthropos, 1994
Pitkin, hanna, Wittgenstein and Justice: On the Significance of Ludwig Wittgenstein for Social and Political Thought, berkeley, university California Press, 1972
Pitkin, hanna,Wittgenstein: el lenguaje, la política y la justicia , Madrid, Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, 1984
Pleasants, nigel, "Winch and Wittgenstein on understanding Ourselves Critically: Descriptive not Metaphysical" en Inquiry 43 (3), 2000, pp. 289-318
Rivera, Jacinto, "Kant y hannah Arendt. La comunidad de juicio reflexionante", Ideas y valores, núm. 128, agosto 2005.
Rorty, Richard, "Wittgenstein, heidegger y la reificación del lenguaje", en Ensayos sobre Heidegger y otros pensadores contemporáneos, barcelona, Paidós, 1993 PMid:8275061
Rubinstein, David, Marx and Wittgenstein. Social Praxis and Social Explanation, Boston, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981.
Skinner, Quentin, Los fundamentos del pensamiento político moderno, México, FCE, 1993.
Trigg, Roger, "Wittgenstein and Social Science", en A. Phillips Griffths, Wittgenstein Centenary Essays, Cambridge, Cambridge university Press, 1991.
Tully, James "Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy" in Political Theory , vol, 17, núm. 2, 1989, pp. 172-204
Winch, Peter, The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1958 [1a. ed. en castellano en buenos Aires, Amorrortu, 1972].
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Sobre la certeza, (trad. de J. Lluis Prades y V. Raga), Barcelona, Gedisa, 1989
Zerilli, Linda, "Judgment", The Encyclopedia of Political Thought, ed. Michel T. Gibbons, London, Blackwell, 2015 PMCid:PMC4517531
Zerilli, Linda, El feminismo y el abismo de la libertad, buenos Aires, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2008 PMCid:PMC2568821
Zerilli, Linda, "The practice of Judgment: hannah Arendt’s Copernican Revolution" in Theory after Theory, ed. Jane Elliott and Dereck Atridge, London, Rotledge, 2011. PMCid:PMC3284240
Zerilli, Linda, "Value Pluralism and the Problem of Judgment: Farewell to Public Reason", Political Theory, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591711426853
Zerilli, Linda, A Democratic Theory of Judgment , Chicago, university of Chicago Press, 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.