Liberalism in crisis. Critical notes on Benjamin Constant’s liberties and slaveries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2022.66.26Keywords:
Slavery, Non-interference, Liberty, DominationAbstract
In this paper I offer a non-ideal analysis of a series of theoretical problems affecting liberalism, which have bearing on liberal discourses in today’s concrete political practices with de-democratizing consequences, including the instrumentalization of liberalism by neoconservative actors. I use Benjamin Constant’s attitude towards slavery as case study to show that liberalism is culpably ignorant of many structural injustices, and that this is so because of its basic thesis that the main oppression is the one the state and the political community exert of the individual. The centrality of this oppression makes liberalism unable to give oppressions exerted within the web of social relations a proper place in its own theory.
Downloads
References
Alexander, J., "The Major Ideologies of Liberalism, Socialism, and Conservatism", Political Studies, 63, 2015, pp. 980-994. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12136
Armitage, D., "John Locke, Carolina, and the Two Treatises of Government", Political Theory, 32:5, 2004, pp. 602-627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591704267122
Berlin, I., "Two concepts of liberty", en Liberty. Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty, ed. por Hardy, H., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002 [1958], pp. 166-217. https://doi.org/10.1093/019924989X.003.0004
Bernasconi, R., y Mann, A., "The Contradictions of Racism: Locke, Slavery, and the Two Treatises", en Valls, A., (ed.), Race and Racism in Modern Philosophy, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 2005, pp. 89-107.
Brewer, H., "Slavery, Sovereignty, and 'Inheritable Blood': Reconsidering John Locke and the Origins of American Slavery", American Historical Review, 122:4, 2017, pp. 1038-1078. https://doi.org/10.1093/ahr/122.4.1038
Brown, W., "American Nightmare. Neoliberalism, Neoconservatism, and De-Democratization', Political Theory, 34:6, 2006, pp. 690-714. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20452506 https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591706293016
Brown, W., In the ruins of neoliberalism. The rise of antidemocratic politics in the West, Nueva York, Columbia University Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.7312/brow19384
Buck-Morss, S., "Hegel and Haiti", Critical Inquiry, 26:4, 2000, pp. 821-65. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1344332. https://doi.org/10.1086/448993
Constant, B., "De la liberté des Anciens comparée à celle des Modernes, discours prononcé à l'Athénée Royal de Paris", Kloocke, K. y Delbouille, P., (eds.)., OEuvres complètes. XV: Brochures politiques (1819-1821), Berlín-Boston, Walter de Gruyter, 2017 [1819], pp. 292-311. Versión castellana: Constant, B., "De la libertad de los antiguos comparada con la de los modernos. Discurso pronunciado en el Ateneo de París", trad. de López, M. A., en Del espíritu de conquista, estudio preliminar de Sánchez Mejía, M. L., traducción de Truyol Wintrich, M. M. y López, M. A., Madrid, Tecnos, 1988, pp.65-93.
Constant, B., De l'esprit de conquête et de l'usurpation, en Kloocke, K. y Fink, B., (eds.), CEuvres completes, VIII, 1: Florestan. De l'esprit de conquête et de l'usurpation. Réflexions sur les constitutions (1813-1814), Berlín-Boston, De Gruyter, 2017 [1814], pp. 549-824. Versión castellana: Constant, B., Del espíritu de conquista y de la usurpación, estudio preliminar y notas de Sánchez-Mejía, M. L., traducción de Portuondo Pérez, A., Madrid, Tecnos, 2008.
Corredor, E., "Unpacking "Gender Ideology" and the Global Right's Anti Gender Countermovement", Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 44:3, 2019, pp. 613-638. https://doi.org/10.1086/701171
Fontana, B., Benjamin Constant and the Post-Revolutionary Mind, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1991. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt2272686
Geuss, R., History and Illusion in Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Geuss, R., "Liberalism and its discontents", Political Theory, 30:3, 2002, pp. 320-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591702030003003
Glausser, W., "Three Approaches to Locke and the Slave Trade", Journal of the History of Ideas, 51:2, 1990, pp. 199-216. https://doi.org/10.2307/2709512
Gray, J., Liberalism. Second edition, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, reimpresión 2003 [1995].
Hinshelwood, B., "The Carolinian Context of John Locke's Theory of Slavery", Political Theory, 41:4, 2013, pp. 562-590. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23484595 https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591713485446
Holmes, S., "Liberal Uses of Bourbon Legitimism", Journal of the History of Ideas, 43:2, 1982, pp. 229-248. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i346271 https://doi.org/10.2307/2709201
Jennings, L., "French anti-slavery under the Restoration: the Société de la morale chrétienne", Revue française d'histoire d'outre-mer, 81:304, 1994, pp. 321-331. https://doi.org/10.3406/outre.1994.3229
Jennings, J., "Constant's Idea of Modern Liberty", en Rosenblatt, H., (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Constant, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 69-91. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521856461.005
Locke, J., Two Treatises of Government. A Critical Edition with and Introduction and Apparatus Criticus by Peter Laslett, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1963 [1689].
Losurdo, D., Controstoria del liberalismo, Bari, Editori Laterza, 2005
Loza, J. y López, M., "Representaciones y repertorios de expresiones conservadoras organizadas contra el aborto en Argentina (2018-2020)", en Torres Santana, A., (ed.), Derechos en riesgo en América Latina. 11 estudios sobre grupos neoconservadores, Bogotá, Fundación Rosa Luxemburg y Ediciones desde abajo, 2020, pp. 55-74. https://sxpolitics.org/es/derechos-en-riesgo-en-america-latina-11-estudios-sobre-grupos-neoconservadores/5101/derechosenriesgoenamericalatina
Mills, C., "Locke on Slavery", en Gordon-Roth, J. y Weinberg, S., (eds.), The Lockean Mind, Nueva York, Routledge, 2021, pp. 487-497. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315099675-62
Mills, C., "Occupy Liberalism! Or, Ten Reasons Why Liberalism Cannot Be Retrieved for Radicalism (And Why They're All Wrong)", Radical Philosophy Review, 15:2, 2012, pp. 305-323. https://doi.org/10.5840/radphilrev201215222
Mills, C., "Ideal Theory as Ideology", Hypatia, 20:3, 2005, pp. 165-184. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3811121 https://doi.org/10.1353/hyp.2005.0107
O'Neill, O., "The dark side of human rights", International Affairs, 81:2, 2005, pp. 427-439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00459.x
Pitts, J., "Constant's Thought on Slavery and Empire", en Rosenblatt, H., (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Constant, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 115-145. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521856461.007
Radi, B., Pugna de derechos, injusticia y legalismo: una aproximación no ideal al derecho a la identidad de género en Argentina, Tesis de Licenciatura en Filosofía, Departamento de Filosofía, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires, 2021.
Rosenberg, A., Democracia y lucha de clases en la Antigüedad, Barcelona, El viejo topo, 2006.
Uzgalis, W., "John Locke, Racism, Slavery, and Indian Lands", en Zack, N., (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Race, New York, Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190236953.013.41
Waldron, J., "Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism", The Philosophical Quarterly, 37:147, 1987, pp. 127-150. https://doi.org/10.2307/2220334
Welchman, J., "Locke on Slavery and Inalienable Rights", Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 25:1, 1995, pp. 67-81. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40231899 https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1995.10717405
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
Funding data
Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva
Grant numbers PICT 2018-1575
