La interpretación del derecho en el positivismo ético contemporáneo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2006.i35.30Keywords:
Legal Interpretation, Legal Positivism, Legal TheoryAbstract
In the never-ending discussion about the nature of legal positivism it has been proposed to return to their Anglo-Saxon origins, namely, Hobbes, Bentham and Austin. Positivistic thesis do not intend to be conceptual nor descriptive, but normative or prescriptive, since they state how ought to be legal systems. This prescriptive feature is not based on the advantages for legal science or on a better description of Law, but on moral and political reasons. Thus the label of ‘ethical positivism’. The paper deals with the theory of interpretation of ethical (prescriptive, normative) positivism proposed by Tom Campbell, who is the most outstanding scholar upholding the return to this kind of legal positivism.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2006 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
