El carácter igualitario del republicanismo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2005.i33.424Keywords:
republicanism, liberalism, EgalitarismAbstract
In this paper I intend to examine Republican Political Philosophy as a conception in dialogue with Liberalism. As I will try to show -through the use of historical examples from the origins of Constitutionalism-, both philosophies are joined by their common egalitarian aspirations, but at the same time display different understandings of the meaning and scopes of the idea of equality. Republicanism, as I will say, comes to «repair» what (they recognize as) deficits in Liberalism while an egalitarian position. However -I will maintain as well-, the success of Republicanism in this task turns out to be, at best, only partial. To proceed with this analysis, I will first refer to some outstanding features of Liberalism; next I will display Republicanism's replies to them; and finally I will mention some of the very limits of this republican reply. From now on I want to make clear that, because of the multiple and different possible characterizations of these both theories we are dealing with -Liberalism and Republicanism-, my presentation will be of interest only to those who accept the descriptions about them that I propose here.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2005 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.