Razón y pasión en Hume (sobre la miseria de la Razón demostrativa)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2007.i36.67Keywords:
Passion, geometrical reason, belief, modernity, rationalism, empiricism, dogmatism, critic of metaphysicAbstract
This paper attempts to review Hume’s criticism of the traditional confrontation between reason and passion. Against the model of a geometrical reason, Hume suggests another possible source of certainty which is capable of overcoming the «miseries » —limits and ideological excesses— of that demonstrative and intuitive reason. There are no geometrical self-evidences in issues concerning facts and morality. Only a renewed and wider concept of rationality is valid when thinking about those issues. Besides mathematical reason and its absolute certainties, there would be another kind of equally valid, but much more useful certainty, that Hume discovers as rooted in the sentimental dimension of human beings. Thus, he reveals «the other of reason» inside reason itself, foreseeing important ideas of contemporary authors, who are critical with the excesses of the modern «charismatic reason».
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2007-06-30
How to Cite
Ruano de la Fuente, Y. (2007). Razón y pasión en Hume (sobre la miseria de la Razón demostrativa). Isegoría, (36), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2007.i36.67
Issue
Section
Notes and Discussions
License
Copyright (c) 2007 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.