“Does Law Matter?”. Judicial Politics, Legal Realism, and the Problem of Indeterminacy of Law as a Methodological Problem

Authors

  • Pablo José Castillo Ortiz University of Sheffield

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2014.051.03

Keywords:

Legal Realism, Judicial Politics, Indeterminacy of law, Theories of judicial decision-making

Abstract


In the last decades the new discipline of Judicial Politics has emerged in the academic landscape, heir of legal realism and determined to study judicial behavior with social-sciences tools and from sociopolitical explanatory variables. In so doing, however, studies in Judicial Politics have left out the role of law in the explanation of the behavior of Justices, using theoretical argumentations based on the indeterminacy of legal rules. In this article, I suggest that the exclusion of legal rules is however an important limitation for the construction of empirical models of judicial behavior.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barnes, J., "Brining the Courts Back In: Interbranch Perspectives on the Courts in American Politics and Policy Making", en Annual Review of Political Science, Vol.10, 2007, pp.25-43.

Brace, P., y Hall, M.G., "Studying Courts Comparatively: The View From the American States", en Political Research Quarterly Vol. 48, 1995, pp. 5-29.

Castillo, P. "La política judicial del Tribunal Constitucional en los procesos de ratificación de tratados de la Unión Europea: aproximación desde un nuevo realismo jurídico", en Revista de Estudios Políticos 159, 2013, pp. 107-138.

Dahl, R., "Decision-Making in a Democracy: the Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker", en Journal of Public Law Vol. 6, 1957, pp. 279-295.

Dyèvre, A., "Making Sense of Judicial Lawmaking: a Theory of Theories of Adjudication", EUI Working Papers 2008/9, 2008, disponible en http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/8510/MWP_2008_09.pdf?sequence=1 (03.06.2013)

Dworkin, R, Taking Rights Seriously, Bloomsbury, Londres/Nueva York, 1997.

Epstein, L. y Knight, J., "Toward a Strategic Revolution in Judicial Politics: A Look Back, a Look Ahead", en Political Research Quarterly, Vol.53, nº.3, 2000, pp.625-661.

García Amado, J.A., "¿Existe discrecionalidad en la decisión judicial?", en Isegoría, Nº35, pp.151-177.

Garoupa, N., Gomez-Pomar, F. y Gil Saldaña, M., "Political Influence and Career Judges: An Empirical Analysis of Administrative review by the Spanish Supreme Court", 2001, disponible en http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1877083 (24.10.2012).

Garoupa, N., Gómez-Pomar F. y Grembi, V. "Judging under Political Pressure: An Empirical Analysis of Constitutional Review Voting in the Spanish Constitutional Court", en Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Vol. 29, nº. 3, 2013, pp. 513-534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewr008

Gibson, J., "Decision Making in Appellate Courts", en Gates, J. y Johnson A., The American Courts: A Critical Assessment,Washington D.C, Q.C. Press, 1991, p. 258.

Gillman, H., "What's Law Got to Do with It- Judicial Behavioralists Test the Legal Model of Judicial Decision Making", en Law and Social Inquiry, Vol.26, nº 2, 2006, pp. 468-469.

Hart, H.L.A., The Concept of Law, Oxford University Press, Nueva York, 1997[1961].

Hierro, L., El realismo jurídico escandinavo. Una teoría empirista del derecho, Iustel: Biblioteca Jurídica Básica, Madrid, 2009.

Holmes, O.W., "The Path of Law", en Harvard Law Review, Vol.10, 1897, disponible en http://constitution.org/lrev/owh/path_law.htm (21.07.2013).

Kelsen, H., Teoría Pura del Derecho, Trotta, Madrid, 2011.

Lax, J., y Rader, K. T., "Legal Constraints in Supreme Court Decision Making: Do Jurisprudencial Regimes Exist?", en The Journal of Politics , Vol. 72, nº. 2, 2010, pp. 273-284.

Leitier, B., "American Legal Realism", en The University of Texas School of Law-Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No.042, 2002.

Magalhães, P., "The Limits to Judicialization: Legislative Politics and Constitutional Review in Iberian Democracies", 2003, (Tesis doctoral no publicada).

Muñoz de Baena, S., "El lugar de Ehrlich en el debate sobre la ciencia jurídica", en Ehrlich, E., Escritos sobre Sociología y Jurisprudencia, Marcial Pons, Madrid, 2005, p. 35.

Murphy, W., Elements of Judicial Strategy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1964

Nourse, V., y Shaffer, R., "Varieties of New Legal Realism: Can a New World Order Prompt a New Legal Theory?", en Cornell Law Review, Vol. 95, 2011, pp. 61-138.

Pritchett, H., The Roosevelt court, Macmillan, Nueva York, 1948.

Redher, B., "What is Political about Jurisprudence? Courts, Politics, and Political Science in Europe and the United States", MPIfG Discussion Paper, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Society, Cologne (Germany), 2007.

Richards, M. J. y Kritzer, H. M. , "Jurisprudencial Regimes in the Supreme Court Decision Making", en American Political Science ReviewVol. 96, N.2, 2002, pp. 305-320.

Segal, J. A., "Predicting Supreme Court Cases Probabilistically: The Search and Seizure Cases, 1962-1981", en American Policial Science Review, Vol. 78, 1984, pp. 891-900.

Schuber, G. "The study of judicial decision-making as an aspect of political behavior", en American Political Science Review Vol.52, nº 4, 1958 pp. 1007-1025.

Shapiro, M., "Political Jurisprudence", en Shapiro M., y Stone Sweet, A., On Law, Politics and Judicialization, Oxford U.P., Oxford, 2002.

Songer, D.R., y Haire, S., "Integrating Alternative Approaches to the Study of Judicial Voting: Obscenity Cases in the U.S. Court of Appeals", en American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 36, 1992, pp. 963-982.

Tamanaha, B., Realistic Socio-Legal Theory, Oxford University Press, New York, 1997.

Ulmer, S., "Toward a theory of sub-group formation in the United States Supreme Court", en The Journal of Politics Vol. 27, nº.1, 1965, pp. 133-152.

Vines, K.N., "The Judicial Role in the American States", en Grossman, J.B., y Tenenhaus, J. (eds.) Frontiers of Judicial Reseach, J. Wiley, Nueva York, 1996, 461-485.

Weber, M., Sociología del Derecho, Comares, Granada, 2001.

Whittington, K., "Once More Unto the Breach: PostBehavioralist Approaches to Judicial Politics", en Law and Social Inquiry Vol. 25, nº. 2, 2000, pp. 601-634.

Wold, J.T., "Political Orientations, Social Backgrounds, and Role Perceptions of State Supreme Court Judges", en Western Political Quarterly Vol. 27, 1974, pp. 239-48.

Downloads

Published

2014-12-30

How to Cite

Castillo Ortiz, P. J. (2014). “Does Law Matter?”. Judicial Politics, Legal Realism, and the Problem of Indeterminacy of Law as a Methodological Problem. Isegoría, (51), 575–596. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2014.051.03

Issue

Section

Articles