The Discreet and Surprisingly Ongoing Influence of Han Feizi, Ideologue of Chinese Despotism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2016.054.02Keywords:
Han Feizi, Neoliberal Discourse, Ideology, Comparative Rhetoric, Classical Chinese RhetoricAbstract
Han Feizi (3rd century B.C.) is the main representative of the Chinese Legalist school (făjiā). The tenets of this political theory have earned him the nickname “the Chinese Machiavelli”. His ideas were adopted by Qin Shihuang, the so-called First Emperor, who unified China and unleashed a despotic régime characterized by the crackdown of any political debate and the suppression of free speech. The connexion between rhetorical development and the political sphere in the context of Classical China’s last stage may set the scene for a wider discussion about that link. Comparative rhetoric will provide further ground for connexions between classical Chinese Legalist ideas and contemporary Neoliberal discourse.
Downloads
References
Booth, W., The Rhetoric of RHETORIC. The Quest for Effective Communication, Blackwell, Malden, MA 2004.
Couret Branco, M., “Economics Against Democracy”, Review of Radical Political Economics, Marzo 2012, 44, pp. 23-29. (Una versión puede consultarse on-line: http://www.fep.up.pt/conferencias/eaepe2007/Papers%20and%20abstracts_CD/branco.pdf)
Goldin, P. R. (ed.), Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Han Fei, Springer, Dordrecht 2013.
Herranz Martín, M., Sabiduría china, Kailas, Madrid 2012. PMid:23226298 PMCid:PMC3511585
Jullien, F., Tratado de la eficacia, Siruela, Madrid 1999. PMCid:PMC1171510
Lakoff, G. Moral Politics, How Liberals and Conservatives Think, University of Chicago Press, Chicago y Londres 20022.
Lakoff, G., No pienses en un elefante. Lenguaje y debate político, Editorial Complutense, Madrid 2007.
Lang Harris, E., “Is the Law in the Way?”, Journal of Chinese Philosophy 38, 1 (marzo 2011), pp. 73-87.
Lerma Peláez, J. G. Semejanzas y diferencias: la analogía en el pensamiento chino pre-Han. Tesis Doctoral, UNED, 2013.
Liao, W. K. The Complete Works of Han Fei Tzu˘. A Classical of Chinese Political Science, II vols. Arthur Probsthain, Londres 1959. (Puede consultarse una versión on-line bilingüe: http://www2.iath.virginia.edu/saxon/servlet/SaxonServlet?-source=xwomen/texts/hanfei.xml&style=xwomen/xsl/dynaxml.xsl&chunk.id=tpage&doc.view=tocc&doc.lang=bilingual)
Lu, Xing. Rhetoric in Ancient China Fifth to Third Century B.C.E. A Comparison with Classical Greek Rhetoric, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C. 1998.
Lundahl, B., Han Fei Zi, The Man and The Work, Institute of Oriental Languages, Stockholm University, Estocolmo 1992.
McCloskey, D. N., “The Rhetoric of Economics”, Journal of Economic Literature, Junio 1983, 21, 2, pp. 481-517.
Reding, J.P., Les fondements philosophiques de la rhétorique chez les sophistes grecs et chez les sophistes chinois , Peter Lang, Berna 1985.
Scarpari, M., Ritorno a Confucio. La Cina di oggi fra tradizione e mercato, Il Mulino, Bolonia 2015. PMid:26512693 PMCid:PMC4626736
Yao Ning y García-Noblejas, G., (trads.), Han Fei Zi. El arte de la política (Los hombres y la ley), Tecnos, Madrid 20102 .
Yao Ning y García-Noblejas, G. (trads.), Libro del maestro Gongsun Long o La Escuela de los Nombres , Trotta, Madrid 2001.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
