The Capabilities Approach, Future Generations and Reduction of Extreme Suffering
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2023.68.24Keywords:
Capabilities approach, Future generations, Animals, Extreme suffering, OverpopulationAbstract
Despite being one of the leading theories of justice, the capabilities approach has not dealt with the problems of our duties towards the environment and future generations. To overcome this problem, Gómez has presented helpful ideas about how the approach could incorporate these duties. Although Gómez’s ideas represent an invaluable contribution to the literature on the capabilities approach, in this paper I defend that her ideas must be supplemented with arguments in favour of the obligation of reducing extreme suffering. In particular, the capabilities approach should defend the obligations of becoming vegan/vegetarian, helping animals in nature and reducing human overpopulation.
Downloads
References
Attfield, R. (2003). Environmental Ethics. Cambridge: Polity.
Baumeister, R.; Bratslavsky, E.; Finkenauer, C. y Vohs, K. (2001). Bad Is Stronger Than Good. Review of General Psychology 5 (4), 323-370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
Benatar, D. (1997). Why It Is Better Never to Come into Existence. American Philosophical Quarterly 34 (3), 345-355.
Deckers, J. (2016). Animal (De)Liberation: Should the Consumption of Animal Products Be Banned? London: Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/bay
Faria, C. y Horta, O. (2020). Welfare Biology. En B. Fischer (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Animal Ethics (pp. 455-466). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315105840-41
Feinberg, J. (1974). The Rights of Animals and Unborn Generations. En W. Blackstone (Ed.), Philosophy & Environmental Crisis (pp. 43-68). Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Gómez, I. (2020). Deudas pendientes. La justicia entre generaciones. Madrid: Plaza y Valdés.
Harrison, G. y Tanner, J. (2016). How Many Children Should We Have? None. The Philosopher's Magazine 75, 72-77. https://doi.org/10.5840/tpm201675133
Holland, B. (2008). Justice and the Environment in Nussbaum's "Capabilities Approach". Why Sustainable Ecological Capacity Is a Meta-Capability. Political Research Quarterly 61 (2), 319-332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907306471
Horta, O. (2017). Un paso adelante en defensa de los animales. Pozuelo de Alarcón: Plaza y Valdés.
Meyer, L. (2021). Intergenerational Justice. En E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition): https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/justice-intergenerational (acceso: 02/06/2022).
Nussbaum, M. (1990). Percepción y revolución: La princesa Casamassima y la imaginación política. En M. Nussbaum, El conocimiento del amor. Ensayos sobre filosofía y literatura (pp. 355-397). Madrid: Antonio Machado Libros.
Nussbaum, M. (1996). Patriotismo y cosmopolitismo. En J. Cohen (Comp.), Los límites del patriotismo. Identidad, pertenencia y «ciudadanía mundial» (pp. 13-29). Barcelona: Paidós.
Nussbaum, M. (1997). El cultivo de la humanidad. Una defensa clásica de la reforma en la educación liberal. Barcelona: Paidós.
Nussbaum, M. (2000). Las mujeres y el desarrollo humano. El enfoque de las capacidades. Barcelona: Herder.
Nussbaum, M. (2006). Las fronteras de la justicia. Consideraciones sobre la exclusión. Barcelona: Paidós.
Nussbaum, M. (2008). Human Dignity and Political Entitlements. En E. Pellegrino, A. Schulman y T. Merrill (Eds.), Human Dignity and Bioethics: Essays Commissioned by the President's Council on Bioethics (pp. 351-380). Washington D.C.: University of Notre Dame Press.
Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating Capabilities. The Human Development Approach. Cambridge: The Belknap Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061200
Nussbaum, M. (2022). Justice for Animals. Our Collective Responsibility. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Parfit, D. (1984). Razones y personas. Boadilla del Monte: Antonio Machado Libros.
Rulli, T. (2016). How Many Children Should We Have? We Should Adopt. The Philosopher's Magazine 75, 83-88. https://doi.org/10.5840/tpm201675135
Saward, M. (2003). Democracy. Cambridge: Polity.
Sen, A. (1996). Fertility and Coercion. The University of Chicago Law Review 63 (3), 1035-1061. https://doi.org/10.2307/1600248
Singer, P. (1972). Famine, Affluence, and Morality. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1 (3), 229-243.
Singer, P. (1990). Liberación animal. Madrid: Trotta.
Soryl, A.; Moore, A.; Seddon, P. y King, M. (2021). The Case for Welfare Biology. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 34, 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-021-09855-2
Tomasik, B. (2015). The Importance of Wild-Animal Suffering. Relations. Beyond Anthropocentrism 3 (2), 133-152. https://doi.org/10.7358/rela-2015-002-toma
Tomasik, B. (2019). How Many Wild Animals Are There? Essays on Reducing Suffering, https://reducing-suffering.org/how-many-wild-animals-are-there/#Bar-On_Phillips_and_Milo_2018 (acceso: 13/04/2023).
Torres, M. (2022). Poder Animal. Capacidades y derechos de los animales. Madrid: Plaza y Valdés.
Velayos, C. (2008). Ética y cambio climático. Bilbao: Desclée De Brouwer.
Vinding, M. (2020). Suffering-Focused Ethics. Defense and Implications. Copenhagen: Ratio Ethica.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
