Paradojas de la filiación kantiana de Rawls
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2004.i31.462Abstract
While it is undeniably so in some aspects and in Rawls stated intention as well, the never quite resolved question of the Kantian leanings of his works is not free of controversy or rather of paradoxical situations which, to our understanding, illustrate the very sense of his work. The root of these paradoxes seems to lie with the fact that while his work follows the Anglo-Saxon tradition, the implicit ethical system which it forms part of is that of a type of utilitarianism which it never gives up completely. The most visible external expression of these paradoxical situations can be found in the very evolution of the theory, moving from its initial affirmation of Kantian morals toward a political, not metaphysical. formulation; nevertheless, it is precisely at this political moment when it is closest to Kantian morals. Perhaps with this, Rawls is offering us the key to another unresolved question of our times: that of the relationship between ethics and politics.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2004 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.