Justicia como imparcialidad dialógica. Una perspectiva de la justicia imparcial compatible con las demandas de los grupos desfavorecidos

Iván Teimil García

doi:10.3989/isegoria.2012.047.11

Authors

Iván Teimil García Universidad de Oviedo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2012.047.11

Keywords:

justice, dialogical impartiality, domination and oppression, difference, universalism, disadvantaged groups, inclusion

Abstract

The critics of the liberal theories of justice have denounce that basic assumptions of these theories such as impartiality and universalism are not realistic and involve pernicious ideological aims. Against this perspective, I sustain that only an impartial and universalistic conception of justice, based on a deliberative vision of politics and participation, could add consistently the demands of the minorities in its democratic model, and at the same time put that model on practice. I understand this impartiality in a deliberativedialogical way. In this essay I defend that impartiality, universalism and difference far from exemplify an anomalous union, make a constellation of inseparable elements, constellation that gives the sense to a truly inclusive and rigorous perspective of justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ackerman, B., Social Justice and the Liberal State, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1980.

Benhabib, S., Situating the Self, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1992. Edición original espa-ola: El ser y el otro en la ética contemporánea, Barcelona, Gedisa, 2006.

Dworkin, R., El imperio de la justicia, Barcelona, Gedisa, 1992.

Fraser, N., Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in Globalizing World, Nueva York, Columbia University Press, 2010.

Fraser, N., «Feminist Politics in the Age of Recognition: A Two-Dimensional Approach to Gender Justice», en Studies in Social Justice, 1:1, 2007, 23-35. Traducción espa-ola: «La política feminista en la era del reconocimiento. Un enfoque bidimensional para la justicia de género», en Carbonero Gamundí, M.ª Antonia y Valdivielso, Joaquín (eds.): Dilemas de la justicia en el siglo XXI. Género y globalización, Palma de Mallorca, UIB, 325-344.

Habermas, J., Teoría de la acción comunicativa I. Racionalidad de la acción y racionalización social, Madrid, Taurus, 2001.

Habermas, J., Verdad y justificaciónn, Madrid, Trotta, 2002.

Honneth, A., The Struggle for Recognition, Reino Unido, Polity Press, 1995.

Honneth, A. y Fraser, N., ¿Redistribución o Reconocimiento?, Madrid, Morata, 2006.

Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Harvard University Press,1971. Edición espa-ola: Teoría de la justicia, Madrid, FCE, 2002.

Rawls, J., Political Liberalism, Nueva York, Columbia University Press, 1993. Edición espa-ola: El liberalismo político, Barcelona, Crítica, 2006.

Sandel, M., Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, Nueva York, Cambridge University Press, 1982. Edición espa-ola: El liberalismo y los límites de la justicia, Barcelona, Gedisa, 2000. PMid:11007242

Young, I. M., Inclusion and Democracy, Nueva York, Oxford University Press, 2002.

Young, I. M. «Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship》 en Feminism and Political Theory, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1994.

Young, I. M., Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1990. Edición espa-ola: Young, I. M. La justicia y la políticade la diferencia, Madrid, Cátedra, 2000.