How to solve a distributive conflict

Authors

  • Francisco García Gibson Universidad de Buenos Aires- Conicet

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2016.054.12

Keywords:

Conflict, Distribution, Proportionality, Normative weight

Abstract


When two agents legitimately claim the same good, the conflict may be solved by (a) letting the agent with the weightiest claim earn a right to the whole good. But there is another way to solve the conflict, by (b) letting the agent with the weightiest claim earn only a part of the good –although the largest part–, while letting the agent with the less weighty claim earn at least a part – although the smallest part–. In this article I argue that solution (b) should pro tanto be used for all distributive conflicts. I then show that reasons to use (a) apply in less situations than it may seem.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beitz, C.R. Political Theory and International Relations . Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1979.

Broome, J. Weighing Goods . Oxford, Blackwell, 1991.

Dancy, J. Ethics without Principles . Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004.

Lenman, J. “Reasons for Action: Justification vs. Explanation”. Zalta E. N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2011, accessible en http:// plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/reasons-just-vs-expl/.

Nickel, J. “Rethinking Rawls’s Theory of Liberty and Rights”. Chicago-Kent Law Review , 69, 1994.

Pogge, T. World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms . Malden, Polity Press, 2002.

Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice . Cambridge, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971. PMCid:PMC2609853

Rawls, J. Collected Papers . Freeman S. (ed.), Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1999.

Rawls, J. The Law of Peoples; With, The Idea of Public Reason Revisited, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1999.

Raz, J. Practical Reason and Norms . Londres, Hutchinson, 1975.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-30

How to Cite

García Gibson, F. (2016). How to solve a distributive conflict. Isegoría, (54), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2016.054.12

Issue

Section

Notes and Discussions