Justice: A Subjective Experience of the Limits of the Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2019.060.18Keywords:
Justice, Law, Desire, Contingency, SubjectivityAbstract
Over the last decades, few topics have generated more debates in the field of political philosophy than the question of justice. Nevertheless, most of these debates have revolved around issues such as what kind of balances between liberty and equality that could be considered to be just, or what kind of legal and judicial institutions would be necessary in order to provide citizens with higher levels of justice. This work intends to address the question of justice from an entirely different perspective. Namely, the way in which the subject –the ‘man of flesh and bone,’ as Unamuno would say– experiences justice. Setting aside the abovementioned institutional aspects of the debate, the goal of this article is to explore the ways in which the term justice functions as an empty signifier in relation to law; and how this, in turn, allows the emergence of a multiplicity of subjective understandings of justice.
Downloads
References
Althusser, L. (2001). "Ideology and Ideological State Apparatus: Notes towards and Investigation", en Lenin and Philosophy and other Essays. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Benjamin, W. (1970). "Theses on the Philosophy of History", en Illuminations. London: Jonathan Cape.
Benjamin, W. (1996). "A Critique of Violence" en Marcus P. Bullock and Michael W. Jennings (eds.) Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings. Vol.1, 1913-1926. Cambridge, Mass.; London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Butler, J. (1997). The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Cornell, D. (1992). The Philosophy of the Limit. New York; London: Routledge.
Derrida, J. (1990). "The Force of Law", Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 11: 920-1045.
Derrida, J. (1992). Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. New York: Routledge.
Freud, S. (2011). El malestar en la cultura. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Heidegger, M. (2010). Being and Time. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Hunt, A. (1978). The Sociological Movement in Law. London: Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15918-5
Hunt, A. (1987). Critical Legal Studies. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Lacan, J. (1979). The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Lacan, J. (1992). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book 7: The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959-1960. London: W. W. Norton.
Lacan, J. (2007). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book 17: The Other Side of Psychoanalysis. New York; London: W.W. Norton.
Laclau, E. (2007). "Why do Empty Signifiers Matter to Politics?", en Emancipation(s). London; New York: Verso.
Luhmann, N. (1995). Social Systems. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Needham, R. (1962). Structure and Sentiment: A Test Case in Social Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nietzsche, F. (2006). Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for All and None. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell.
Palacios, M. (2013). Radical Sociality: On Disobedience, Violence and Belonging. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137003690
Philips, A. (1994). On Flirtation. London; Boston: Faber and Faber.
Rawls, J. (1972). A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Clarendon.
Rentschler, C. A. (2011). Second Wounds. Durham and London: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822393887
Sandel, M. (2010). Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do? London: Penguin. https://doi.org/10.1037/e597132010-001
Unamuno, M. (2004). Vida de Don Quijote y Sancho. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Unamuno, M. (2008). Del sentimiento trágico de la vida. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality. Oxford: Robertson.
Wittgenstein, L. ([1953] 1967). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
