Equaliberty and participatory parity: basic elements to democratize the democracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2023.68.012Keywords:
Equaliberty, Democracy, Participatory parity, Political conflict, CitizenshipAbstract
This article proposes a schematic development of Nancy Fraser’s participatory parity concept as a complementary element to Étienne Balibar’s proposal to democratize democracy, which is part of the dialectic of equaliberty as a framework for the interpretation of political modernity. It will be shown that neoliberalism implies a particular event in the development of the struggle for equaliberty, annulling its insurrectional content and therefore, hindering a democratizing perspective, in the vision of the French author, requires recovering the political conflict that began in the French revolution in around equaliberty. Participatory parity, it will be argued, meets the requirements demanded by Balibar’s vision and, the particular interpretation of it that will be exposed would serve as basic elements to democratize the democracy.
Downloads
References
Balibar, É. (2005). Violencias, identidades, civilidad (trad. de Luciano Padilla). Editorial Gedisa, Barcelona.
Balibar, É. (2013). Ciudadanía. Adriana Hidalgo editora
Balibar, É. (2017). La igualibertad. Herder Editorial.
Balibar, É. (2019). 10. Absolute Capitalism. In W. Callison & Z. Manfredi (Ed.), Mutant Neoliberalism: Market Rule and Political Rupture (pp. 269-290). New York, USA: Fordham University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823285730-011
Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism's stealth revolution. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt17kk9p8
Castro-Gómez, S. (2019). El tonto y los canallas: notas para un republicanismo transmoderno. Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.9789587813579
Domènech, A. (2019). El eclipse de la fraternidad: una revisión republicana de la tradición socialista. Editorial AKAL.
Fraser, N. (1997). Iustitia Interrupta. Bogotá. Siglo del Hombre Editores
Fraser, N., y Lamas, M. (1991). La lucha por las necesidades: Esbozo de una teoría crítica socialista-feminista de la cultura política del capitalismo tardío. Debate Feminista, 3, 3-40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42623971 https://doi.org/10.22201/cieg.2594066xe.1991.3.1493
Fukuyama, F. (1992). El Fin de la Historia y el Ultimo Hombre, 2.º Edición. Editorial Planeta, Colombia.
Habermas, J. (1988). "La crisis del Estado de bienestar y el agotamiento de las energías utópicas". Ensayos políticos, 113-134.
Honneth, A. (2014). El derecho de la libertad: esbozo de una eticidad democrática. Katz editores.
Laclau, E. (2012). La razón populista. Fondo de cultura Económica.
Laclau, E. Mouffe. Ch., (2004): Hegemonía y estrategia socialista, hacia una radicalización de la democracia. Fondo de cultura económica.
Lefort, C. (1990). La invención democrática, trad. Irene Goff, Nueva Visión, Buenos Aires.
Mouffe. C. (2003). La paradoja democrática. Editorial Gedisa, España.
Offe, C. (1984). Contradictions of the welfare state. Hutchinson & Co.
Palacio, M. (2010). La paridad participativa en la obra de Nancy Fraser. Aequalitas: Revista jurídica de igualdad de oportunidades entre mujeres y hombres, 26: 58-70.
Pestaña, J. L. M., & Moreno, J. Á. R. ¿Qué libertad requiere el socialismo de mercado? Las contribuciones de Antoni Domènech y Axel Honneth. Revista izquierdas, 51, 1-16.
Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government. Oxford University Press.
Rodríguez, B. P. (2003). Hegel y el fin de la historia. Revista de filosofía, 28(2), 325-352.
Wright, E. O. (2020). Cómo ser anticapitalista en el siglo XXI (Vol. 91). Ediciones Akal.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
