Figures of Disaffection in Ethical Life. Hegel and Political Subjectivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2024.70.1417Keywords:
ethical life, Hegel, subjectivity, disaffection, exclusionAbstract
Disaffection is a matter of political subjectivity, a break in the political bond of the self. This article examines whether such a break is possible, how far it goes and which modalities it has. Can a subject constitute itself, and recognize itself outside any political dimension? To answer this question, I discuss in detail the notion of modern subjectivity outlined by Hegel in his Philosophy of Law, considering its affective, economic and state (or purely political) dimensions. Based on this model, I propose three possible figures of disaffection —the indifferent, the excluded, the dissident— to conclude that all three nevertheless maintain a political bond and can be aware of their moral limitations.
Downloads
References
Alhambra, M.; Ruiz, S. (2017) “Contra el votante medio. Indicios de desigualdad social y capital político a partir de la abstención electoral y la estructura de voto en Madrid y Barcelona”. Encrucijadas, 13.
Adorno, Th. (2001) Minima Moralia. Reflexionen aus dem beschädigten Leben. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Arendt, H. (1951) The Origins of Totalitarianism. Nueva York: Schocken.
Avineri, Sh. (2003) Hegel’s Theory of the Modern State. Cambridge: CU Press.
Bauman, Z. (2003) Wasted Lives. Londres: Polity Press.
Brown, W. (1995) States of Injury: power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton: Princeton UP.
Cuartango, R. (2016) El poder del espíritu. Hegel y el ethos político. Madrid: Abada.
Eribon, D. (2017) Regreso a Reims. Madrid: Libros del Zorzal.
Esposito, R. (2000) “La perspectiva de lo impolítico”. Nombres-Revista de filosofía, 15.
Fleitas, M. (2022) De la impaciencia tardomoderna de la libertad. Lima: Ediquid.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1986) Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts.Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Hegel, G. W. F. (2010) Fenomenología del espíritu. Madrid: Abada.
Honneth, A. (2001) Leiden an Unbestimmtheit. Frankfurt: Reklam.
Kervegan. J.-F. (1988) “Les conditions de la subjectivité politique : Incidences du concept hegelian de « Politische Gesinnung»”. Les etudes philosophiques, 99, 99-110.
Kervegan, J.-F., (2008) Hegel, Carl Schmitt. Lo político entre especulación y positividad. Madrid: Escolar y Mayo.
Kloc-Konkolowizc, J. (2019) “Staat als Ort der Solidarität. Wie der hegelsche Staat das System der Atomistik überwinden kann”. Hegel-Jahrbuch, 1, 585-597.
Moyar, D. (2014) Hegel’s Conscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Neuhouser, F. (2008) Foundations of Hegel’s Social Theory: Actualizing Freedom. Cambridge: Harvard University press.
Nietzsche, F. (1988) Also sprach Zarathustra, en Kritische Gesamtausgabe. Berlin: De Gruyter, vol. 5.
Pereña, F. (2022) El fracaso moral de la humanidad. Madrid: Síntesis, 2022.
Pharr, S.; Putnam, R. (2000) Dissafected democracies. Princeton: Princeton UP.Pippin, R. (2008) Hegel’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Postone, M. (1993) Time, Labor and Social domination. Chicago: Chicago UP.
Ranciere, J. (1996) El desacuerdo. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.
Rawls, J. (1996) Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rothman. J. (2016) “How to Restore Your Faith in Democracy”. The New Yorker, November 11. http://www.newyorker.com/culture/persons-of-interest/how-to-restore-your-faith-in-democracy
Ruda, F. (2011) Hegels Pöbel. Eine Untersuchung der “Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts”. Konstanz: Konstanz University Press.
Schmitt, C. (1932) Der Begriff des Politischen. Berlin: Duckel & Humblot.
Shklar, J. (1991) American Citizenship. The Quest for Inclusion. Cambridge: Harvard UP.
Theunissen, M. (1991) “The Repressed Intersubjectivity in Hegel’s Philosophy of Right”. In Hegel and Legal Theory, edited by Drucilla Cornell and Michael Rosenfeld. Nueva York: Routledge.
Thiebaut, C. (1998) Vindicación del ciudadano. Un sujeto reflexivo en una Sociedad compleja. Barcelona: Paidós.
Williams, R. (1998) Hegel’s Ethics of Recognition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
Funding data
Dirección General de Investigación Científica y Técnica
Grant numbers PID2021-124954NB-I00