Un “ethos” para el gobierno y la administración: un debate entre el liberalismo y el jesuitismo políticos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2006.i35.31Keywords:
Jesuitism, “ethos” of obedience, ecclesiastic burocracy’s, Ribadeneira, Machiavelli, SchmittAbstract
This survey refutes Carl Schmitt’s thesis that hold catholicism, and jesuitism in particular, as a great complexio oppositorum which joins both conservatism and leftism under a same absolute unity represented by the papal forms. The “ethos” of obedience postulated by the Society of Jesus decisively contributed to the formation of an Administration that surpasses the ecclesiastic burocracy’s framework. It replaced the Renaissance education for an education with a Thomist stamp, decisive in the fashioning of the disciplined “ethos” of the official who acts sine ira et studio. But it failed for its attempt to replace the vitality, the naturalism and the confrontation of opinions of Liberalism under the aforementioned complexio oppositorum.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2006-12-30
How to Cite
Sauquillo, J. (2006). Un “ethos” para el gobierno y la administración: un debate entre el liberalismo y el jesuitismo políticos. Isegoría, (35), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2006.i35.31
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2006 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.